Re: [kitten] Comments on draft-ietf-kitten-password-storage-00

Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com> Tue, 22 September 2020 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <rharwood@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38383A09F4 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.794
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.794 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.695, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wMPytuJRF84J for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E7E23A09DB for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 09:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1600793975; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rYhn2k3qfZu+Fp2NJLJ7vljJRfUmXTjMp2wS8ubpvDo=; b=BpuTJWo2SuKmvBmv6ZDJiNW3F38h0mDvKAC+j/JqueCrxO0TLRGjQ+0Af3Vb8YgbLoH8fN OtWA2fG3G/KuH6nJ0vWv95+4XdTrb0H482/qoVXzu0xB3y7Oi3XjvQaHH/Z4fCebVX90KC lGMo8GyMlpjJqg5guKeUGYa1ga6XWnI=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-574-sAf9sfdVPNqYCjOyHiRRww-1; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:59:32 -0400
X-MC-Unique: sAf9sfdVPNqYCjOyHiRRww-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C328801AB7; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:59:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.10.110.15]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D764A10023A5; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:59:30 +0000 (UTC)
From: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>, kitten@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-kitten-password-storage@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6dde1303-3d0c-6811-c201-00edbe5ab84e@bluepopcorn.net>
References: <6dde1303-3d0c-6811-c201-00edbe5ab84e@bluepopcorn.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:59:29 -0400
Message-ID: <jlgk0wleoi6.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=rharwood@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/YCGg7xdsZj5XFEsk-LopFGhYgUk>
Subject: Re: [kitten] Comments on draft-ietf-kitten-password-storage-00
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 16:59:38 -0000

Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I'm not generally up to speed on the work of the kitten WG, but someone
> pointed out this draft and thought I'd be interested, and I am. Please
> bear that in mind if some of my suggestions conflict with GSS-API,
> Kerberos, etc. And I'm not familiar with the various SASL mechanisms so
> don't have any comments on them.

Hi Jim, thanks for taking a look.

Sam, have you had a chance to take a look at the review?

Thanks,
--Robbie