IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] review of draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-extensions-iana-07

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> Wed, 16 October 2013 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E45E11E8192 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BHxcRDGp07Fp for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu [18.7.68.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A49411E8109 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 12074422-b7f5a8e000000a34-fe-525ec8febe10
Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 6B.09.02612.EF8CE525; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:12:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id r9GHCTve014467; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:12:30 -0400
Received: from multics.mit.edu (system-low-sipb.mit.edu [18.187.2.37]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id r9GHCRxI032157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:12:28 -0400
Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id r9GHCQcd018372; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:12:26 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:12:26 -0400
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <525EB7EF.2000808@isode.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1310161310250.4934@multics.mit.edu>
References: <50992138.9030200@sunet.se> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1308051219450.24720@multics.mit.edu> <525EB7EF.2000808@isode.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrDIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrPvvRFyQwZxJQhYzVhdZHN28isWB yWPJkp9MHqeaDQOYorhsUlJzMstSi/TtErgynp84zVZwk71izoQb7A2ME9m6GDk5JARMJC70 LmeBsMUkLtxbDxTn4hAS2Mcoce/aT1YIZyOjxNsJS6Eyh5gkrnw5yw7hNDBKfDh5hR2kn0VA W2Lp2Z1gNpuAisTMNxvBdogI6EusfjULbAezgLrEtzNvGEFsYQFvicOtc4FWcHBwCmhKLPyt DhLmFXCQ+LH3LSPE/FZGiV2/W1hBEqICOhKr909hgSgSlDg58wnUTEuJc3+us01gFJyFJDUL SWoBI9MqRtmU3Crd3MTMnOLUZN3i5MS8vNQiXVO93MwSvdSU0k2MoEBld1HawfjzoNIhRgEO RiUe3hnL44KEWBPLiitzDzFKcjApifLqHAMK8SXlp1RmJBZnxBeV5qQWH2KU4GBWEuH9tBUo x5uSWFmVWpQPk5LmYFES573FYR8kJJCeWJKanZpakFoEk5Xh4FCS4FUERqSQYFFqempFWmZO CUKaiYMTZDgP0HAOkBre4oLE3OLMdIj8KUZFKXFeFZCEAEgiozQPrheWSF4xigO9IswrA1LF A0xCcN2vgAYzAQ0Wngg2uCQRISXVwNg6f2vkEuveW7yfDt+UT73Qbvfd6sQUPyauk9X3PKK1 XCelJH7Iuvpe6NkGyX3LHR2EV4l2K6d7n+7quTTh+aT+MyJZz6wXPz7U/lakQjAvMuOQ5/XL X3SfCjUK/p+34+h2FlOl00d+7NeZ0yTz7lXaXc0TJp4c4su2q1/+4zbHeyUT76+0zQpKLMUZ iYZazEXFiQBhaLFp/wIAAA==
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [kitten] review of draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-extensions-iana-07
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:12:41 -0000

On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> On 05/08/2013 19:47, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
>> I've also reviewed version -07, and don't see anything particularly 
>> objectionable.
>
> Thank you for the review. I believe I addressed most of the editorial 
> comments from you and Leif.

Thanks.

>> The "Expert Reviewer" entry is internally inconsistent about how many 
>> reviewers can be listed in a single field.  Multiple instances are allowed, 
>> which would seem to indicate that one-reviewer-per-instance is the correct 
>> disambiguation.
>
> Yes, this is how it typically works. Do you think this needs to be clarified?

Looking back at this, I think I just wanted the text in the "possible 
values" column for the "expert reviewer" entry to say "Name of expert 
reviewer" (singular) rather than "Name of expert reviewers" (plural).  The 
description notes that multiple instances of the field are allowed, so 
everything else would be okay.

-Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email