Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] IETF74 krb-wg minutes

Larry Zhu <lzhu@windows.microsoft.com> Sat, 27 June 2009 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF4D3A6CD5 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E-sdN3gJ0ZE0 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9F53A68A0 for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.ctd.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15757C; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:43:17 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lists.anl.gov (katydid.it.anl.gov [146.137.96.32]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F5B50; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:43:16 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from katydid.it.anl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6ED80E07; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:43:16 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6782280E05 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:43:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) id 582DD38; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:43:14 -0500 (CDT)
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.ctd.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5379F50 for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:43:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov (mailrelay.anl.gov [130.202.101.22]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5EA38 for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:43:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.it.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372317CC086; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:43:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelay.anl.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21384-02; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:43:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgateway.anl.gov (mailgateway.anl.gov [130.202.101.28]) by mailrelay2.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7E57CC05D for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:43:14 -0500 (CDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AikAALboRUqDa3PWkWdsb2JhbACYfgEBAQEJCwoHEwadd5cYhA0FgTeCGYUw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,301,1243832400"; d="scan'208";a="28468232"
Received: from mailc.microsoft.com (HELO smtp.microsoft.com) ([131.107.115.214]) by mailgateway.anl.gov with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2009 11:43:13 -0500
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.174) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.99.4; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:43:12 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.71.68) by TK5EX14MLTC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.174) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.0.601.1; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:43:12 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([169.254.1.90]) by TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.71.68]) with mapi; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:43:12 -0700
From: Larry Zhu <lzhu@windows.microsoft.com>
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>, Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
Thread-Topic: [Ietf-krb-wg] IETF74 krb-wg minutes
Thread-Index: AQHJ90UT4m4lCktwEkiOB0OE9Nyp85Bani5D
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:43:12 +0000
Message-ID: <D3DC9D45B39CFC4CB312B2DD279B354C06E540@TK5EX14MBXW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frigga.it.anl.gov
Cc: "ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov" <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] IETF74 krb-wg minutes
X-BeenThere: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a list for the IETF Kerberos Working Group. {WORLDPUB, EXTERNAL}" <ietf-krb-wg.lists.anl.gov>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/options/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.anl.gov/pipermail/ietf-krb-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov
Errors-To: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov

I will look into this.

Sent from my Windows MobileĀ® phone.

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2009 9:34 AM
To: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
Cc: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] IETF74 krb-wg minutes


Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> writes:

> Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> writes:
>
>> --On Friday, April 24, 2009 01:43:32 PM -0700 Larry Zhu
>> <lzhu@windows.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>>> That part of the minutes was taken verbatim from Jeff's note. I will
>>> double check the notes and Shawn's scribe and post an update as
>>> necessary. Thanks,
>>
>> My notes were intended as notes to myself on points that might require
>> some followup by me, and while many of the items in those notes
>> correspond directly to things that happened in the meeting, not all
>> do.
>>
>> The item in question refers to a proposal I intended to make on this
>> list, which I haven't yet had time to do and which was not discussed
>> in the meeting.  The core of that proposal was to take the starttls
>> document as it stood at the time of the meeting, modulo the outcome of
>> the certificate validation discussion which was still going on at that
>> point.
>
> Any update on this?
>
> It would be useful to clarify if you believe there has been some change
> in the IETF 73 suggestion to move both krb5starttls and FAST forward as
> experimental.

Chairs, I would appreciate your reply on this.

/Simon
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg

_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg