IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] IETF74 krb-wg minutes

Larry Zhu <lzhu@windows.microsoft.com> Fri, 24 April 2009 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3A53A67EB for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.510, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sJlE7P-6dtT0 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6773A680D for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.ctd.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817392B; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:43:41 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lists.anl.gov (katydid.it.anl.gov [146.137.96.32]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1741C2F; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:43:41 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from katydid.it.anl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000B480DFD; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:43:40 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E26080DFB for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:43:39 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) id 2FB5E2B; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:43:39 -0500 (CDT)
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.ctd.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF9F2F for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:43:39 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov (mailrelay.anl.gov [130.202.101.22]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4C82B for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:43:39 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.it.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCC57CC05A; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:43:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelay.anl.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27024-02; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:43:38 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgateway.anl.gov (mailgateway.anl.gov [130.202.101.28]) by mailrelay2.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CDE7CC056 for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:43:38 -0500 (CDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ak8AAG/B8UmDa3PWkWdsb2JhbACWTgEBAQEJCwoHEQaiGpcYg3QF
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.40,243,1238994000"; d="scan'208";a="26333361"
Received: from mail3.microsoft.com (HELO smtp.microsoft.com) ([131.107.115.214]) by mailgateway.anl.gov with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2009 15:43:38 -0500
Received: from tk5-exhub-c104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.88.97) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.99.4; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:43:37 -0700
Received: from tk5-exmlt-w601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.18.32) by tk5-exhub-c104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.88.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.99.4; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:43:37 -0700
Received: from NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([fe80::8de9:51a2:cd62:f122]) by tk5-exmlt-w601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.18.32]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:45:41 -0700
From: Larry Zhu <lzhu@windows.microsoft.com>
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:43:32 -0700
Thread-Topic: [Ietf-krb-wg] IETF74 krb-wg minutes
Thread-Index: AcnFHSGTMdtmGWF6Rmqt8ZpHS2FUxQAABreQ
Message-ID: <AB1E5627D2489D45BD01B84BD5B900461500A64BA7@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <AB1E5627D2489D45BD01B84BD5B900461500A64ACE@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <87k559lrbg.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
In-Reply-To: <87k559lrbg.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frigga.it.anl.gov
Cc: "ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov" <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] IETF74 krb-wg minutes
X-BeenThere: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a list for the IETF Kerberos Working Group. {WORLDPUB, EXTERNAL}" <ietf-krb-wg.lists.anl.gov>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/options/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.anl.gov/pipermail/ietf-krb-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov
Errors-To: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov

That part of the minutes was taken verbatim from Jeff's note. I will double check the notes and Shawn's scribe and post an update as necessary. Thanks,

--Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov [mailto:ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Simon Josefsson
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 1:39 PM
To: Larry Zhu
Cc: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] IETF74 krb-wg minutes

Larry Zhu <lzhu@windows.microsoft.com> writes:

> I have posted the krb-wg meeting minutes for IETF74 at
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/09mar/minutes/krb-wg.txt. Please send
> Jeff and me your comments or corrections.

This part related to krb5starttls

  We decided that starttls should require certificate validation using
  pre-shared certificates.

does not match my recollection of the meeting.  First, I don't recall
that any decisions were made at all for krb5starttls during the meeting,
instead it was referred to the list.  Secondly, I think what we actually
discussed and had some agreement on was to NOT require certificate
validation.  See jabber discussions at the beginning of:

http://jabber.ietf.org/logs/krb-wg/2009-03-24.txt

Further, this part of the summary:

  The intended status of the starttls document was also not decided and
  it was only discussed briefly in the jabber room.

I don't see any discussion about the intended status in the jabber logs?
As far as I recall from the IETF 73 meeting, it was suggested that both
krb5starttls and FAST would move forward as experimental.  I think it
would be better to move forward both as standards track, but if the WG
feels otherwise I would accept that.  Is this the current thinking?
What is the current thinking about document status of FAST and
krb5starttls?

/Simon
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg

_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email