IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Experimental status of RFC 2307

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 03 August 2011 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3AC21F8A23 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.134
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.134 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.465, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TuE8d8DOIxEh for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE29421F842D for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4146438; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:20:53 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lists.anl.gov (katydid.it.anl.gov [146.137.96.32]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id B730E44; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:20:50 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from katydid.it.anl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB4480E9B; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:20:50 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov (mailrelay.anl.gov [130.202.101.22]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294D980E91 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:20:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.it.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144167CC05A; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:20:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelay.anl.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05770-01; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:20:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgateway.anl.gov (mailgateway.anl.gov [130.202.101.28]) by mailrelay.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB83C7CC056 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:20:47 -0500 (CDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAMyQOU5FGcQc/2dsb2JhbABDp2B3gUABAQU6PxALDQEKCSUPAQQYMROHcLgaiH+GQgSYIItb
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,311,1309755600"; d="scan'208";a="64563129"
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.suchdamage.org) ([69.25.196.28]) by mailgateway.anl.gov with ESMTP; 03 Aug 2011 13:20:47 -0500
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18B6920244; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:22:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 9CE1E422B; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:19:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
References: <tslr56cohgy.fsf@mit.edu> <4E194EE2.7090502@oracle.com> <1310304454.8182.122.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org> <4E1A96F6.6020308@oracle.com> <1310944282.23822.61.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org> <4E38F93E.8040104@oracle.com> <tsl1ux2y5m8.fsf_-_@mit.edu> <4E398FC5.5010807@symas.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:19:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4E398FC5.5010807@symas.com> (Howard Chu's message of "Wed, 03 Aug 2011 11:13:25 -0700")
Message-ID: <tsld3gmwe76.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frigga.it.anl.gov
Cc: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Experimental status of RFC 2307
X-BeenThere: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a list for the IETF Kerberos Working Group. {WORLDPUB, EXTERNAL}" <ietf-krb-wg.lists.anl.gov>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/options/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.anl.gov/pipermail/ietf-krb-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov
Sender: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov

>>>>> "Howard" == Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com> writes:

    Howard> Sam Hartman wrote:
    >> 
> I think that RFC 2307 can be an appropriate normative reference even
    >> if it is experimental.  The IETF has a procedure for such
    >> references.  If the working group believes that is the right
    >> reference to use, I will start tilting at process windmills. I
    >> think it unlikely any of them will turn into giants. Mostly, I
    >> need to walk through the argument based on our process documents
    >> with the IESG, and I expect that to be relatively easy to pull
    >> off.

    Howard> What exactly are you referencing in 2307? (Sorry, haven't
    Howard> been paying close attention to this list in a while.) I
    Howard> think most sites moved to RFC2307bis, and there's still this
    Howard> later revision to consider:

    Howard> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-howard-rfc2307bis-02.txt

mostly the semantics for the attributes in 2307.
A reference to an internet draft would be inappropriate here.
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email