IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Experimental status of RFC 2307

Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com> Wed, 03 August 2011 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D0021F86BE for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZN8pf7y3wNiI for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A3521F862F for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1053D; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:14:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lists.anl.gov (katydid.it.anl.gov [146.137.96.32]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A933F; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:14:05 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from katydid.it.anl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id D997380E9B; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:14:05 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov (mailrelay.anl.gov [130.202.101.22]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F0380E91 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:14:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.it.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA667CC05A; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:14:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelay.anl.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03220-04; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:14:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgateway.anl.gov (mailgateway.anl.gov [130.202.101.28]) by mailrelay.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4397CC056 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:14:04 -0500 (CDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtUDAJ+POU5AR5jrgWdsb2JhbABDDqdSFAEBFiYlgUABAQU4HSMBEAsYCRYPCQMCAQIBRQYNAQcCBYdnwR6GQgSHWoshiWyGQVc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,311,1309755600"; d="scan'208";a="64562624"
Received: from lirone.symas.net ([64.71.152.235]) by mailgateway.anl.gov with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 03 Aug 2011 13:13:38 -0500
Received: from cpe-76-94-188-8.socal.res.rr.com ([76.94.188.8] helo=[192.168.1.20]) by lirone.symas.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <hyc@symas.com>) id 1Qofwk-00044o-Bj; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 11:13:34 -0700
Message-ID: <4E398FC5.5010807@symas.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 11:13:25 -0700
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0a1) Gecko/20110612 Firefox/7.0a1 SeaMonkey/2.4a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
References: <tslr56cohgy.fsf@mit.edu> <4E194EE2.7090502@oracle.com> <1310304454.8182.122.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org> <4E1A96F6.6020308@oracle.com> <1310944282.23822.61.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org> <4E38F93E.8040104@oracle.com> <tsl1ux2y5m8.fsf_-_@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tsl1ux2y5m8.fsf_-_@mit.edu>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frigga.it.anl.gov
Cc: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Experimental status of RFC 2307
X-BeenThere: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a list for the IETF Kerberos Working Group. {WORLDPUB, EXTERNAL}" <ietf-krb-wg.lists.anl.gov>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/options/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.anl.gov/pipermail/ietf-krb-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov
Sender: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov

Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> I think that RFC 2307 can be an appropriate normative reference even if
> it is experimental.  The IETF has a procedure for such references.  If
> the working group believes that is the right reference to use, I will
> start tilting at process windmills. I think it unlikely any of them will
> turn into giants. Mostly, I need to walk through the argument based on
> our process documents with the IESG, and I expect that to be relatively
> easy to pull off.

What exactly are you referencing in 2307? (Sorry, haven't been paying close 
attention to this list in a while.) I think most sites moved to RFC2307bis, 
and there's still this later revision to consider:

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-howard-rfc2307bis-02.txt

-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email