Re: [L2CP] Updated LC charter

stefaan.de_cnodder@alcatel.be Mon, 22 May 2006 17:27 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiEBq-0006NK-Je; Mon, 22 May 2006 13:27:34 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiEBp-0006Ma-GO for l2cp@ietf.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 13:27:33 -0400
Received: from smail.alcatel.fr ([62.23.212.165]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiEBi-0002VZ-Um for l2cp@ietf.org; Mon, 22 May 2006 13:27:33 -0400
Received: from bemail06.netfr.alcatel.fr (bemail06.netfr.alcatel.fr [155.132.251.30]) by smail.alcatel.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k4MHRPEn014986 for <l2cp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 May 2006 19:27:25 +0200
Received: from [138.203.192.189] ([138.203.192.189]) by bemail06.netfr.alcatel.fr (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12HF868) with ESMTP id 2006052219272338:4952 ; Mon, 22 May 2006 19:27:23 +0200
Message-ID: <4471F47B.7020906@alcatel.be>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 19:27:23 +0200
From: stefaan.de_cnodder@alcatel.be
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matthew.Bocci@alcatel.co.uk
Subject: Re: [L2CP] Updated LC charter
References: <OF4A2DB3F0.97006032-ON80257176.0058F313-80257176.0059BB70@netfr.alcatel.fr>
In-Reply-To: <OF4A2DB3F0.97006032-ON80257176.0058F313-80257176.0059BB70@netfr.alcatel.fr>
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on BEMAIL06/BE/ALCATEL(Release 5.0.12HF868 | May 16, 2005) at 05/22/2006 19:27:23, Serialize by Router on BEMAIL06/BE/ALCATEL(Release 5.0.12HF868 | May 16, 2005) at 05/22/2006 19:27:25, Serialize complete at 05/22/2006 19:27:25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 155.132.180.81
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9a2be21919e71dc6faef12b370c4ecf5
Cc: l2cp@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: l2cp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Control Protocol Discussion List <l2cp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp>, <mailto:l2cp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/l2cp>
List-Post: <mailto:l2cp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2cp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp>, <mailto:l2cp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: l2cp-bounces@ietf.org

Matthew,

some comments inline....


Purpose:

The purpose of the ANCP WG is to standardize an IP based Access Node
Control Protocol (ANCP) for use in service provider Digital Subscriber
Line (DSL) access and aggregation networks. ANCP operates between a DSL
Access Node (AN) and Network Access Server (NAS).

Necessary Terminology:

Access Node (AN) - Network device, usually located at a service
provider central office, that terminates DSL connections from
Subscribers. Often referred to as a Digital Subscriber Line Access
Multiplexer (DSLAM)

Network Access Server (NAS) - Network device which aggregates
multiplexedSubscriber traffic from a number of Access Nodes. The NAS
plays a central role in per-subsciber policy enforcement and QoS. Often
referred to as an Broadband Network Gateway (BNG) or Broadband Remote
Access Server (BRAS).

[Stefaan] RFC2138 already define the term NAS. Is it the same 
definition? Is it needed to repeat it, if not the same then better to 
use another term.

Goals:

ANCP is intended to address the requirement for a bidirectional, IP-
based, control protocol that operates across multiple types (i.e.,
Ethernet, ATM) of DSL access and aggregation networks. The goal of an
ANCP message exchange is to convey status and control information
between one or more ANs and one or more NASs without going through
intermediate element managers.


The ANCP WG will address the following four use-cases:

1. Dynamic Access Loop Characterization
Various queuing and scheduling mechanisms are used in access networks
to avoid congestion while dealing with multiple flows and distinct QoS
profiles. Communicating the access-loop characteristics and current DSL
synchronization rate between the AN and Subscriber up to the NAS is
desirable, particularly when the NAS is providing QoS for individual
flows and subscribers. ANCP will provide a mechanism to communicate
dynamic access-loop characteristics from the AN to the NAS.

2. Access Loop Configuration
In additional to reporting Access Loop characteristics from the AN to
the NAS, ANCP will allow a NAS to send loop-specific configuration
information to an AN based on the results of subscriber authentication
and authorization (e.g., after AAA responses have been received at the
NAS).

3. Remote Connectivity Test
Traditional DSL access and aggregation networks employ point-to-point
ATM circuits between the AN and NAS for each subscriber, allowing
troubleshooting of the local loop from the NAS via end-to-end ATM
loopbacks. With the increasing deployment of Ethernet in the access and
aggregation network, operators require consistent methods to test and
troubleshoot connectivity for mixed Ethernet and ATM access networks
(including the local loop). ANCP will allow a remote procedure for a
local loop connectivity test to be triggered from the NAS with results
communicated back to the NAS.

[Stefaan] I would remove "via end-to-end ATM loopbacks" because the text 
seems to suggest that ATM loopbacks have to be used consistently...



4. Multicast
When multicast replication for subscriber-bound traffic is performed at
the AN, it offloads the network between the AN and NAS. However, a
subscriber's policy and configuration for multicast traffic may only be
known at the NAS. ANCP will provide a mechanism to communicate the
necessary information exchange between the AN and NAS so as to allow
the AN to perform subscriber bound multicast group replication in line
with the subscriber's policy and configuration, and also allow the NAS
to follow each subscriber's multicast group membership.

Non-Goals:

ANCP is an IP-based protocol that operates between the AN and NAS, over
a DSL access and aggregation network. It will not address setup or
configuration of circuits or connections in the access and aggregation
network itself.

The focus of this WG is on one very specific application space. While
the design of the protocol should be general as to not preclude other
uses in the future should a need arise, it is not a goal of this WG
to address specific requirements outside of DSL access and aggregation
networks.


[Stefaan] A goal of the working group is to solve the requirements for 
DSL access in such a way that the solution can be re-used later for 
other technologies as well. Is is something that should be clearer in 
the "goals" section.

regards,
Stefaan


_______________________________________________
L2cp mailing list
L2cp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2cp