Re: [L2sm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8466 (6555)

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 23 April 2021 08:34 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4B83A10BA for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 01:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.782
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.782 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=2.7, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q4Rjy6jUuzK2 for <l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 01:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E2C53A10C3 for <l2sm@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 01:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 13N8Xfhk012914; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:33:41 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288B82203A; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:33:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12F0E2203C; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:33:41 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (74.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.74] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 13N8XdH2004054 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:33:40 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: warren@kumari.net, rwilton@cisco.com
Cc: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, l2sm@ietf.org, bill.wu@huawei.com, bin_wen@comcast.com, giuseppe.fioccola@tim.it, xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn, luay.jalil@verizon.com
References: <20210423062911.16C7BF407B3@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210423062911.16C7BF407B3@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 09:33:37 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <078501d7381b$5cf017b0$16d04710$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJhpkyVyTR5el9vz9kczhV5kKWCT6ms6dhQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.74
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-26108.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--6.032-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--6.032-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-26108.006
X-TMASE-Result: 10--6.032300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 0dFPYP4mu5TxIbpQ8BhdbKmG3MWYmj6iVBDQSDMig9EsvosvPNHPCRrc RWdmnX4x/nSi4wuo5VDL9MAMnvTQ2ZpXMYRMNS2ckNUp3q2HfhCd59K8Z4R3VrV5fSMRD1zqkgf dQr7u8z/z3tSgA3V7vO8u0vWSykeSfYgoHl6iERIHRzaQbsazqFQT4wfzn/hU/Pz+0V0K0ADeSC fd3mLQsVcOSo04aWUOWqLBUk/Na0svKBNTYKG+pdfeP+V/VXwsKPalXQl6Qbcy2ckJNvUX+FQgf voorQE+T3mrAt/5gS+1abtfpcjoNBVD58+XxOLjiZH+akICId0QOcMSo0926vKYdkM8fJGzlOts 73NQ5aPCZPOZQquXXHxvRiDyaBiBLtd9AP2rlF4T0vQc28rNUcZJvtGKTC9XvZ8uBoOFsy+sQZL 8qlcJbZrshU0ckp3ubZMuQM1EwgCvvxILmKK/HIMbH85DUZXyKzfM9B6IRt76C0ePs7A07YVH0d q7wY7ujApSuZhrgVzFbouGEawP0fvTDJHv2b2pm0gvs5PprRNmqmvRWPhnn8C+ksT6a9fy
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/8Y6vgsOR12QldvqmoJGunCRiNeo>
Subject: Re: [L2sm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8466 (6555)
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:34:14 -0000

ADs...

This report is correct.

Best,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> 
Sent: 23 April 2021 07:29
To: bin_wen@comcast.com; giuseppe.fioccola@tim.it; xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn; luay.jalil@verizon.com; warren@kumari.net; rwilton@cisco.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk; bill.wu@huawei.com
Cc: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; l2sm@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8466 (6555)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8466,
"A YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) Service Delivery".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6555

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>

Section: 8

Original Text
-------------
                container vxlan {
                  when "derived-from-or-self(../type, "
                     + "'l2vpn-svc:vxlan')" {
                    description
                      "Only applies when the type of the tagged
                       interface is 'vxlan'.";
                  }
                  if-feature "vxlan";
                  leaf vni-id {
                    type uint32;
                    mandatory true;
                    description
                      "VXLAN Network Identifier (VNI).";
                  }
                  leaf peer-mode {
                    type identityref {
                      base vxlan-peer-mode;
                    }
                    default "static-mode";
                    description
                      "Specifies the VXLAN access mode.  By default,
                       the peer mode is set to 'static-mode'.";
                  }
                  list peer-list {
                    key "peer-ip";
                    leaf peer-ip {
                      type inet:ip-address;
                      description
                        "Peer IP.";
                    }
                    description
                      "List of peer IP addresses.";
                  }
                  description
                    "QinQ.";
                }

Corrected Text
--------------
                container vxlan {
                  when "derived-from-or-self(../type, "
                     + "'l2vpn-svc:vxlan')" {
                    description
                      "Only applies when the type of the tagged
                       interface is 'vxlan'.";
                  }
                  if-feature "vxlan";
                  leaf vni-id {
                    type uint32;
                    mandatory true;
                    description
                      "VXLAN Network Identifier (VNI).";
                  }
                  leaf peer-mode {
                    type identityref {
                      base vxlan-peer-mode;
                    }
                    default "static-mode";
                    description
                      "Specifies the VXLAN access mode.  By default,
                       the peer mode is set to 'static-mode'.";
                  }
                  list peer-list {
                    key "peer-ip";
                    leaf peer-ip {
                      type inet:ip-address;
                      description
                        "Peer IP.";
                    }
                    description
                      "List of peer IP addresses.";
                  }
                  description
                    "Container for VXLAN.";
                }

Notes
-----
The description should refer to VXLAN not QinQ.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8466 (draft-ietf-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) Service Delivery
Publication Date    : October 2018
Author(s)           : B. Wen, G. Fioccola, Ed., C. Xie, L. Jalil
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : L2VPN Service Model
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG