[L2sm] FW: The I-D we mentioned that discussed "service models"

Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B1C1293D8; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:00:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.718
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.718 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6iXTVazSbqlp; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:00:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E52541293F9; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (EHLO lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com) ([]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DAR45425; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:00:51 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml703-cah.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:00:51 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:00:45 +0800
From: Zhoutianran <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "l2sm@ietf.org" <l2sm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [L2sm] The I-D we mentioned that discussed "service models"
Thread-Index: AdJAdOwHxn/mPPqOTZ60iHj+kJtYcgAAIk0Y
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:00:45 +0000
Message-ID: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21A2257215@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <092601d24074$f0a40230$d1ec0690$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <092601d24074$f0a40230$d1ec0690$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020205.582D0F54.0051, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: d9dfe5c3556fbf20bf8bcd39f8ebe296
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/WF3K2U1KclYCJN2vnjYP6yQzR_c>
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: [L2sm] FW: The I-D we mentioned that discussed "service models"
X-BeenThere: l2sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Layer Two Virtual Private Network Service Model \(L2SM\)" <l2sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2sm>, <mailto:l2sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:00:56 -0000

Yes. I am sitting in the L2SM meeting room, and heard many discussions about the terminology wrt the service model. 
Obviously, those terms and definitions are confusion, but important and need widely discussed.
Please come to the opsawg mailing list, and help the authors to improve the document.


发件人: L2sm [l2sm-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Adrian Farrel [adrian@olddog.co.uk]
发送时间: 2016年11月17日 9:50
收件人: l2sm@ietf.org
主题: [L2sm] The I-D we mentioned that discussed "service models"


Benoit pointed our discussion of "what is a service model" to:
- The OPSAWG mailing list
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained/

Noting that this is not an OPSAWG draft at the moment, but that there was
(apparently) some support for working on it when it was presented in the OPSAWG
meeting this week.

See also the slides for that presentation at

I think what Benoit means is "Please have the discussion in OPSAWG so that we
can reach an Area-wide decision and then apply it to L2SM."


L2sm mailing list