Re: [L2tpext] draft-ietf-l2tpext-tdm-05

Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com> Tue, 05 August 2008 04:43 UTC

Return-Path: <l2tpext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: l2tpext-archive-1@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-l2tpext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D573A6922; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 21:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: l2tpext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2tpext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECA03A6922 for <l2tpext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 21:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.111, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rLSejowl6lUU for <l2tpext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 21:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eci-iron1.ecitele.com (eci-iron1.ecitele.com [147.234.242.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27E43A68F3 for <l2tpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 21:43:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO ILPTAM01.ecitele.com) ([147.234.244.44]) by eci-iron1.ecitele.com with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2008 07:52:04 +0300
Received: from ilptexch01.ecitele.com ([172.31.244.40]) by ILPTAM01.ecitele.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 07:43:53 +0300
Received: from ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com ([147.234.244.212]) by ilptexch01.ecitele.com ([172.31.244.40]) with mapi; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 07:43:53 +0300
From: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
To: Ignacio Goyret <igoyret@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:43:50 +0300
Thread-Topic: [L2tpext] draft-ietf-l2tpext-tdm-05
Thread-Index: Acj2WlP5pHEmrvJRSAeVvYV4MdbHBQAW3NMg
Message-ID: <A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C7680267C52F1@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com>
References: <200808011905.m71J5x7h001725@cliff.eng.ascend.com> <A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C7680265CEA76@ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com> <200808041748.m74HmS0i006284@cliff.eng.ascend.com>
In-Reply-To: <200808041748.m74HmS0i006284@cliff.eng.ascend.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Aug 2008 04:43:53.0797 (UTC) FILETIME=[DD09A750:01C8F6B5]
Cc: "l2tpext@ietf.org" <l2tpext@ietf.org>, "sharon.galtzur@gmail.com" <sharon.galtzur@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [L2tpext] draft-ietf-l2tpext-tdm-05
X-BeenThere: l2tpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions <l2tpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/l2tpext>
List-Post: <mailto:l2tpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: l2tpext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: l2tpext-bounces@ietf.org

Ignacio,
Lots of thanks, will do that.

Regards,
        Sasha
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ignacio Goyret [mailto:igoyret@alcatel-lucent.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 8:46 PM
> To: Alexander Vainshtein
> Cc: Ignacio Goyret; l2tpext@ietf.org; sharon@rawflow.com
> Subject: Re: [L2tpext] draft-ietf-l2tpext-tdm-05
>
>
> >> * IANA Considerations:
> >>   Just to make it clear to everyone involved, you may want
> to separate
> >>   the lonely return code from the list of return/error
> codes and make
> >>   two lists: a return code list (one item) and an error code
> >> list (with
> >>   the 5 items).
> >
> >I would appreciate your advice regarding split of the IANA
> Considerations section.
>
> Sure. My thought was that instead of this:
>
>    New return codes and error codes:
>
>    1. RC-TBD-1 - return code to indicate connection refused
>       because of TDM PW parameters. The exact error code is as
>       follows.
>    2. EC-TBD-1 - indicate Bit Rate values disagree.
>    3. EC-TBD-2 - indicate different trunk types in the case of
>       trunk-specific CESoPSN with CAS
>    4. EC-TBD-3 - requested payload size too big or too small.
>    5. EC-TBD-4 - RTP header cannot be generated.
>    6. EC-TBD-5 - requested timestamp clock frequency cannot be
>       generated
>
> The table could be split like this:
>
>    New return codes for the CDN message:
>
>    1. RC-TBD-1 - Connection refused because of TDM PW parameters.
>       The Error Code indicates the problem.
>
>    New error codes, to be used with RC-TDB-1 return code:
>
>    1. EC-TBD-1 - Bit Rate values disagree (TDM PW AVP).
>    2. EC-TBD-2 - Different trunk types (for trunk-specific
>                  CESoPSN with CAS).
>    3. EC-TBD-3 - Requested payload size too big or too small.
>    4. EC-TBD-4 - RTP header cannot be generated.
>    5. EC-TBD-5 - Requested timestamp clock frequency cannot be
>                  generated.
>
> This format is more in line with IANA's registry.
>
> Makes sense?
> -Ignacio
>
>
_______________________________________________
L2tpext mailing list
L2tpext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext