Re: [L2tpext] WGLC for draft-ietf-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator

Ignacio Goyret <i.goyret@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 03 November 2015 02:18 UTC

Return-Path: <i.goyret@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581E81ACD96; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:18:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Awkl7JwMcQfm; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:18:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpgre-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59DEF1ACD92; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:18:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.5.2.63]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 7079F8CCE5E8C; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 02:18:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from cliff.eng.ascend.com (cliff.eng.ascend.com [192.207.23.55]) by us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id tA32I6kd020417 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Nov 2015 02:18:08 GMT
Received: from igoyret-c1.alcatel-lucent.com (vpn-2-30.vpn.alcatel-lucent.com [135.224.2.30]) by cliff.eng.ascend.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id tA32I43t019265 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:18:05 -0800
Message-Id: <201511030218.tA32I43t019265@cliff.eng.ascend.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 18:17:40 -0800
To: l2tpext@ietf.org
From: Ignacio Goyret <i.goyret@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <201510192003.t9JK3sgH010715@cliff.eng.ascend.com>
References: <201510191639.t9JGdXLG004819@cliff.eng.ascend.com> <201510192003.t9JK3sgH010715@cliff.eng.ascend.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2tpext/5NuyUOUh7HvZdGrd6PjQ_c-s4Fk>
Cc: rtg-bfd@ietf.org, pals@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [L2tpext] WGLC for draft-ietf-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator
X-BeenThere: l2tpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions <l2tpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l2tpext/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2tpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 02:18:14 -0000

Given the very low quantity of responses (1, not counting authors)
and since this is a meeting week, I'll extend the WG Last Call
another week until Monday Nov/9/2015.

Hopefully, by then, more people may have found the time to read
this very short draft and answer yeah/nay.

Thanks all,

-Ignacio
L2tpext chair


>At 09:39 10/19/2015, Ignacio Goyret wrote:
>>Hi group, 
>>
>>This email starts a two-week Working-Group Last-Call (WGLC) for
>>draft-ietf-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator-00
>>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator/
>>
>>Please send comments to the list and state whether or not you support
>>progressing this document (in the later case, please also state the
>>reasons). Silence is not indication of support.
>>
>>This poll runs until ** November 3rd, 2015 **.
>>
>>We are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this
>>draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
>>IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>>
>>* If you are listed as a document author or contributor *, please
>>respond only if you are aware of any changes to IPR from your
>>response during the poll for adoption, at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2tpext/current/msg01389.html
>>
>>If you are *not* listed as an author or contributor, then please
>>explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not
>>yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>>
>>Thank you,
>>
>>Carlos and Ignacio
>>L2tpext co-chairs
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>L2tpext mailing list
>>L2tpext@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext
>
>_______________________________________________
>L2tpext mailing list
>L2tpext@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext