Re: [L2tpext] WGLC for draft-ietf-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator

Hi all

As a team member involved in aspects of SBFD implementation and having
gone through the draft, I support this draft¹s advancement.

Thanks
Srihari

On 20/10/15 12:07 am, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
wrote:

>Hi,
>
>There are no changes to my IPR response regarding
>draft-ietf-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator.
>
>This is a simple doc, which completes the S-BFD set; as a co-author, I
>support its advancement.
>
>Thanks,
>
>‹ Carlos.
>
>> On Oct 19, 2015, at 12:39 PM, Ignacio Goyret
>><i.goyret@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi group,
>> 
>> This email starts a two-week Working-Group Last-Call (WGLC) for
>> draft-ietf-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator-00
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2tpext-sbfd-discriminator/
>> 
>> Please send comments to the list and state whether or not you support
>> progressing this document (in the later case, please also state the
>> reasons). Silence is not indication of support.
>> 
>> This poll runs until ** November 3rd, 2015 **.
>> 
>> We are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to this
>> draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
>> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>> 
>> * If you are listed as a document author or contributor *, please
>> respond only if you are aware of any changes to IPR from your
>> response during the poll for adoption, at
>>http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2tpext/current/msg01389.html
>> 
>> If you are *not* listed as an author or contributor, then please
>> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not
>> yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Carlos and Ignacio
>> L2tpext co-chairs
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> L2tpext mailing list
>> L2tpext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext
>