IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [L2tpext] WG Adoption of Keyed IPv6 Tunnel [draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel]

"Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 04 March 2014 06:02 UTC

Return-Path: <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4031C1A03A1 for <l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 22:02:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1x_cujuiJq6i for <l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 22:02:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoemail1.alcatel.com (hoemail1.alcatel.com [192.160.6.148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775941A0395 for <l2tpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 22:02:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by hoemail1.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s246239e006151 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 00:02:05 -0600 (CST)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s24621vi010143 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 07:02:01 +0100
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.10]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 07:01:59 +0100
From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, "l2tpext@ietf.org" <l2tpext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption of Keyed IPv6 Tunnel [draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel]
Thread-Index: AQHPNx/V4LVBgSNREk+0k0rZkVGQB5rQX3YA
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 06:01:58 +0000
Message-ID: <CF3B1CC2.B38E6%wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <D3A58613-B4F3-4E6C-A90E-BE2732D8A6B9@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D3A58613-B4F3-4E6C-A90E-BE2732D8A6B9@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <6858BA1BAECA68428ACAEB80F26C2B9C@exchange.lucent.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2tpext/JwxFXziXcfXuLrpJjxTK5muzKF4
Cc: "draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel@tools.ietf.org" <draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [L2tpext] WG Adoption of Keyed IPv6 Tunnel [draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel]
X-BeenThere: l2tpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions <l2tpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2tpext/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2tpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 06:02:12 -0000

Support as co-author

On 03/03/14 20:33, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
wrote:

>WG,
>
>The authors of 'Keyed IPv6 Tunnel' have requested that L2TPEXT adopts
>this draft as a WG document. The draft received discussion and comments
>on the list, and was updated twice based on list feedback.
>
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-00
>
>This message starts a three-week Call for WG Adoption for
>draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-00. Given that IETF89 is going
>on right now, we are adding an extra week to this adoption call. The call
>for adoption will end on Monday, March 24th.
>
>Please share your thoughts on this adoption call on the list -- we will
>not be taking silence as support. Bonus points supporting a yes/no email
>with a technical explanation as to why.
>
>Thanks!
>
>Carlos.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email