IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [L2tpext] WG Adoption of Keyed IPv6 Tunnel [draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel]

"JOHNSON, ALASTAIR (ALASTAIR)" <alastair.johnson@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 04 March 2014 10:59 UTC

Return-Path: <alastair.johnson@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DCB1A06DF for <l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 02:59:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D_I9UmxEHy30 for <l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 02:59:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C1E1A067A for <l2tpext@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 02:59:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-5-2-66.lucent.com [135.5.2.66]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s24AxYCQ025124 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 04:59:35 -0600 (CST)
Received: from US70TWXCHHUB04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70twxchhub04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.36]) by us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s24AxWBO022227 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 05:59:32 -0500
Received: from US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.10.153]) by US70TWXCHHUB04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.36]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 05:59:32 -0500
From: "JOHNSON, ALASTAIR (ALASTAIR)" <alastair.johnson@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, "l2tpext@ietf.org" <l2tpext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption of Keyed IPv6 Tunnel [draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel]
Thread-Index: AQHPNx/V4LVBgSNREk+0k0rZkVGQB5rQwqCg
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 10:59:32 +0000
Message-ID: <84F61C40C26A3C42A194978BBF3F21352D54EB@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <D3A58613-B4F3-4E6C-A90E-BE2732D8A6B9@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D3A58613-B4F3-4E6C-A90E-BE2732D8A6B9@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.17]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2tpext/VNEng5JL3uwrxoPHPHxFvdrqI-Y
Cc: "draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel@tools.ietf.org" <draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [L2tpext] WG Adoption of Keyed IPv6 Tunnel [draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel]
X-BeenThere: l2tpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions <l2tpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2tpext/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2tpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 10:59:44 -0000

Support as implementer. We have this in shipping code and has been interop-proven with other implementations.

AJ



> -----Original Message-----
> From: L2tpext [mailto:l2tpext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos
> Pignataro (cpignata)
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 12:33 PM
> To: l2tpext@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: [L2tpext] WG Adoption of Keyed IPv6 Tunnel [draft-mkonstan-
> l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel]
> 
> WG,
> 
> The authors of 'Keyed IPv6 Tunnel' have requested that L2TPEXT adopts
> this draft as a WG document. The draft received discussion and comments
> on the list, and was updated twice based on list feedback.
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-00
> 
> This message starts a three-week Call for WG Adoption for draft-
> mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-00. Given that IETF89 is going on
> right now, we are adding an extra week to this adoption call. The call
> for adoption will end on Monday, March 24th.
> 
> Please share your thoughts on this adoption call on the list -- we will
> not be taking silence as support. Bonus points supporting a yes/no
> email with a technical explanation as to why.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Carlos.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email