IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn

"Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 01 October 2013 03:46 UTC

Return-Path: <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BD621F9A4A for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Raq4U8l6mp8I for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC74521F9928 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 20:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r913jkq1015667 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:45:47 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712wxchhub03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.74]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r913jhlO014872 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Oct 2013 05:45:43 +0200
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.193]) by FR712WXCHHUB03.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.74]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Tue, 1 Oct 2013 05:45:43 +0200
From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn
Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn
Thread-Index: AQHOvgWyMOikIcjVIEmeqODrb6o5apnfNVcA
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 03:45:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CE7011FF.83440%wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <00389807-3589-47BC-98FF-462CEAA22378@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.7.130812
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.39]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <0420504C5EE667478F8BDBCD115F61D0@exchange.lucent.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 03:46:22 -0000

support

On 30/09/13 19:51, "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:

>This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:
>
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-allan-l2vpn-spbm-evpn-04
>
>should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.
>
>please review the draft and respond to the list by Monday 14th October
>with comments as to its suitability, or not, for WG adoption.
>
>Nabil & Giles

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email