Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-wildcards-00

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 07 December 2011 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DF521F8558 for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:04:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VMJoDY4ygo9E for <l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:03:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1310.opentransfer.com (mail1310.opentransfer.com [76.162.254.103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6350B21F8509 for <l3vpn@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:03:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 18350 invoked by uid 399); 7 Dec 2011 01:03:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.135.66?) (189.61.212.94) by mail1310.opentransfer.com with ESMTP; 7 Dec 2011 01:03:58 -0000
X-Originating-IP: 189.61.212.94
Message-ID: <4EDEBB7E.6090007@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 02:03:58 +0100
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ben Niven-Jenkins <ben@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
Subject: Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-wildcards-00
References: <1BFE7EAB-8CB7-4AC3-87EC-74F3EC54AC15@niven-jenkins.co.uk> <4EDEAFA7.9080803@raszuk.net> <B1B1D5E4-BB08-499F-BA8B-819AA312120C@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <B1B1D5E4-BB08-499F-BA8B-819AA312120C@niven-jenkins.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "l3vpn@ietf.org mailing list" <l3vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 01:04:00 -0000

Hello Ben,

I am not aware about any former draft/rfc where there are "zombie authors".

In most documents I have authored section 8 is directly populated from 
the xml header. So even technically I am keen on better understanding 
how xml2rfc conversion tool can list 4 authors in the header and 8 in 
the section 8.

And that is very different from contributors section or separate section 
listing the authors or co-authors of the document.

Best regards,
R.

PS. The common convention during the merge if sigma of authors is 
greater then 5 is to just leave editors of the documents undergoing 
merge - here we are observing a bit different phenomenon.


> Robert,
>
> On 7 Dec 2011, at 00:13, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>
>> Support.
>>
>> However for clarity and future reference perhaps it would be good
>> to document the process of removing 4 authors from the header of
>> the draft and only leaving them in section 8. In particular Yiqun
>> and IJsbrand being original co-authors and contributors to the
>> idea.
>>
>> Even if this is a result of merge with
>> draft-rekhter-mvpn-wildcard-spmsi-04.txt removing original authors
>> of the idea seems odd.
>
> I don't know the specifics for this particular draft as I wasn't
> involved in writing it or any of the drafts that were merged together
> to form it but as I'm sure you know
>
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/policy.html#policy.authlist
>
> states the policy of no more than 5 authors on the front page and
> that they "should be the lead author(s) who are most responsible for
> the actual text" so my assumption is that the authors listed on the
> front page of draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-wildcards-00 are those "most
> responsible" for the text of the combined draft rather than
> necessarily those "most responsible" for the original idea(s).
>
> If anyone feels strongly about only being credited in the "Authors"
> section and not on the front page itself they should bring it up with
> me privately offline.
>
> Regards Ben
>
>
>>
>> Thx, R.
>>
>>> Colleagues,
>>>
>>> This e-mail is the start of a 2 week WG Last Call for
>>> draft-ietf-l3vpn-mvpn-wildcards-00.
>>>
>>> Please read the draft and provide any comments you may have.
>>>
>>> Feedback should be provided to the mailing list and/or the
>>> authors.
>>>
>>> Last Call ends at midnight PST on the 20th December.
>>>
>>> Thanks Ben
>>>
>>
>
>
>