IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Late IPR disclosure on RFC7024 - Opinions ?

"Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Fri, 24 October 2014 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA231A8ABD; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BFswM69E437a; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28FA1A8AEB; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.123] (static-72-71-250-38.cncdnh.fast04.myfairpoint.net [72.71.250.38]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0C928D56D8; Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:34:32 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_65A1A2A5-2143-4F96-8B94-A04A0C2F166D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
Subject: Re: Late IPR disclosure on RFC7024 - Opinions ?
From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERkLH6UDU-+sy1uEU=HQG54HscRfGUJFOfsP1xV+ZUcApw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 08:13:43 -0400
Message-Id: <179C0B5C-18F8-4111-9222-5565BDDA33F0@lucidvision.com>
References: <544404B6.4060605@alcatel-lucent.com> <5449476C.1080307@queuefull.net> <CA+b+ER=WENsHrD8hFmoceVUd3qDNSBXE13xPCoEijtwzhJ9c8Q@mail.gmail.com> <54497A88.3050808@alcatel-lucent.com> <CA+b+ERkLH6UDU-+sy1uEU=HQG54HscRfGUJFOfsP1xV+ZUcApw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3vpn/_dWWC775c6YLq2h9AZo1f4R3R5Q
Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, L3VPN <l3vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l3vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l3vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l3vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3vpn>, <mailto:l3vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 12:34:35 -0000

> On Oct 23, 2014:6:08 PM, at 6:08 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Ok .. I only based that statement on few recent requests from chairs asking explicitely only authors to state the IPR knowledge of their docs.
> 
> To Tom's point if this is "ill advised and strongly discouraged" to talk about IPR on the lists what is this thread all about then ? Why it has been even started ? To blindly say yes or no to content of the IPR disclousure no one posseses any knowledge of ? 

	Discussing the IPR policy itself is cool, but the specifics of particular patents has been discouraged. 

	—Tom


> 
> r.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com <mailto:martin.vigoureux@alcatel-lucent.com>> wrote:
> Robert
> 
> Le 23/10/2014 21:22, Robert Raszuk a écrit :
> Chairs normally ask only authors for IPR statement.
> 
> I do not believe this is the norm.
> IETF IPR policies concern a broader set of people than "authors".
> 
> -m
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email