Re: [Lager] [media-types] media-type registration request review

Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> Fri, 04 March 2016 19:44 UTC

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=UseGiLDa3OkNN+ShtNL9w6lrGpYEK7yhEA1VGF1KoqCaDNY3UOaO8NCVlve6ab41; h=Received:Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
References: <A70C83D7-B170-4486-92AD-43BED221916C@viagenie.ca> <CALcoZiodFagzBk9QyhzUuqb=VZc62vGxY=560oweaNopdSRgfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <56D9E56E.1090301@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2016 11:43:42 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALcoZiodFagzBk9QyhzUuqb=VZc62vGxY=560oweaNopdSRgfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lager/Ah-C025TWxCLQv4tRTRXZN-iTPA>
Cc: draft-ietf-lager-specification@ietf.org, media-types@iana.org, lager WG <lager@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lager] [media-types] media-type registration request review
Precedence: list

On 3/4/2016 11:23 AM, Mark Baker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>   draft-ietf-lager-specification requests the registration of a new
>> media-type. The document has passed WGLC and we would like to have a review
>> of the request. Herein the extract of the media-type form from the draft.
>> Thanks in advance for the review
>>
>> Marc, lager wg co-chair
>>
>> <extract>
>> 11.1.  Media Type Registration
>>
>>     The media type "application/lgr+xml" should be registered to denote
>>     transmission of label generation rulesets that are compliant with
>>     this specification, in accordance with [RFC6838].
>>
>>     Type name: application
>>
>>     Subtype name: lgr+xml
>>
>>     Required parameters: None.
>>
>>     Optional parameters: charset (as for application/xml per [RFC7303])
>>
>>     Security considerations: As for application/xml per [RFC7303]
> I suggesting moving section 12 of the draft here.
>
>>     Interoperability considerations: As for application/xml per [RFC7303]
>>
>>     Published specification: This document.
>>
>>     Applications which use this media type: Software using label
>>     generation rulesets, including registry applications and client
>>     validators.
> Can you be more specific, as the registry information will be stored
> and viewed out of the context of the LAGER WG. Maybe "Software using
> IDNA label generation rulesets"? That's just a guess on my part, as
> I'm not very familiar with nomenclature in that space.

The label generation rulesets specification is not limited to IDNA.

Software using label generation rulesets for internationalized 
identifiers, such IDNs, including...


>
>>     Additional information: None.
>>
>>     Magic number: None.
>>
>>     File extension: .lgr or .xml
> .xml is associated with application/xml so I'd just stick with .lgr.

Apparently there are some other media types that use .xml., so what are 
the conventions?

A./
>
> Looks good otherwise.
>

[Lager] media-type registration request review Marc Blanchet
Re: [Lager] [media-types] media-type registration… Asmus Freytag
Re: [Lager] [media-types] media-type registration… Martin J. Dürst