Re: [Lager] Next Steps for LAGER

On 26 Feb 2016, at 4:26, Martin J. Dürst wrote:

> On 2016/02/26 14:35, Yoshiro YONEYA wrote:
>>> <no hat>Given that almost everything is now developed using JSON 
>>> instead
>>> of XML, it would be much better to have a clear specification on how 
>>> to
>>> implement the XML-JSON-XML mapping, instead of everyone having his 
>>> own
>>> interpretation of the mapping. Vcard-xcard-jcard was done similarly.
>>
>> +1
>
> I agree that we want a single JSON mapping, not many. And I agree that 
> a lot of stuff these days is done using JSON, not XML. But my guess is 
> that LAGER data won't be as widely used as Vcard-xcard-jcard.

of course.

> And there must have been some reason for why it was started with XML 
> (which I don't know, but would like to know).
>
> So if there are already people looking around how to do this in JSON,

yes. already.

Marc.

> then it makes sense to nail it down. But starting this work just based 
> on the hunch that somebody is eventually going to use some JSON for it 
> would be the wrong thing to do in my opinion.
>
> Regards,   Martin.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lager mailing list
> Lager@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lager