Re: [Lager] AD review of draft-ietf-lager-specification-10

[Asmus Freytag <[e-mail]>]

Kim,

two items I am passing to you:

On 3/14/2016 11:05 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> -- Section 5.3.5 --
>> >
>> >    Two contexts may be complementary, as in the following example, which
>> >    shows ARABIC LETTER TEH MARBUTA (U+0629) as a variant of ARABIC
>> >    LETTER ALEF MAKSURA (U+0649), but with two different types.
>> >
>> >        <char cp="0647" >
>> >          <var cp="0629" not-when="arabic-final" type="blocked" />
>> >          <var cp="0629" when="arabic-final" type="allocatable" />
>> >        </char>
>> >
>> >There's an error here: the text says "ALEF MAKSURA (U+0649)", but the
>> >example says "<char cp="0647" >"
>> >
>> >==> changed 0649 to 0647
> Is that the right direction?  Unicode says that U+0647 is ARABIC
> LETTER HEH, and that U+0649 is ARABIC LETTER ALEF MAKSURA.

 From the Root zone LGR:

  <char cp="0629" tag="sc:Arab" ref="0 100">
       <var cp="0647" type="allocatable" comment="In the Arabic 
language, U+0647 HEH may be substituted for U+0629 TEH MARBUTA. [RFC 
6365]" />

so it should be U+0647 and  ARABIC LETTER HEH...I missed fixing the name.

Kim, can you make this change?

(aside: the root zone LGR gave up on this kind of mutually-exclusive 
conditional context for positional variants because we found the task of 
verifying them mechanically to be intractable in the general case - 
however, there are different types of contexts in other scripts that are 
much more straightforward and that aren't as problematic, hence the 
warning instead of a request to remove the feature.)
>
>> >-- Section 5.5 --
>> >
>> >    Formally, it MUST correspond to
>> >    the XML 1.0 Nmtoken (Name token) production.
>> >
>> >Because conforming to Nmtoken is a requirement, it would be good to
>> >have a citation to where in the XML spec Nmtoken is defined.
>> >
>> >==> not done - could use help locating
> Sure:
> NEW
>     Formally, it MUST correspond to the XML 1.0 Nmtoken (Name token)
>     production (see [XML] Section 2.3).
> END
Kim, can you make that change?

A./