Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09.txt> (Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1) to Best Current Practice

"RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 11 November 2020 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAC43A0DD3; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:32:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0OJCzcx9_FGU; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:32:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A3433A0869; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:32:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75351F406CB; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:32:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uqBBi628vEt0; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:32:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from www.rfc-editor.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE73FF406C2; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:32:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 87.113.103.132 (SquirrelMail authenticated user rfcpise) by www.rfc-editor.org with HTTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:32:15 -0800
Message-ID: <3b1b02f203d2fa30050807b7459cff0c.squirrel@www.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:32:15 -0800
From: "RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)" <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
To: last-call@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate.all@ietf.org, rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
Reply-To: rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.21
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/J36RerKenEiR14NDYorl3R_lLDo>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09.txt> (Deprecating TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:32:27 -0000

Hi,

Six of the RFCs that this document proposes to "update" were published on
the Independent Submission Stream.

They are: [RFC7562], [RFC6042], [RFC5456], [RFC5024], [RFC4540], and
[RFC3656]

Having looked through these RFCs and read the draft, I conclude that the
updates are appropriate and desirable. The ISE supports this action.

Thanks,
Adrian
-- 
Adrian Farrel (ISE),
rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org

> The IESG has received a request from the Transport Layer Security WG
> (tls) to consider the following document: - 'Deprecating TLSv1.0 and
> TLSv1.1' <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-09.txt> as Best Current
> Practice
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> last-call@ietf.org mailing lists by 2020-11-30. Exceptionally, comments
> may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.