IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Last-Call] Re: [Anima] Re: Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-12

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Tue, 17 September 2024 06:40 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E23C14F70A; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 23:40:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cRsLwQk-sP6e; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 23:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [IPv6:2a00:bd80:aa::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABB7CC14F604; Mon, 16 Sep 2024 23:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1726555208; bh=/qd+xaPdBN5KzpJ7mC8f95oBRuvYxcwfN0BWH9ENdg8=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=GG0q0SvA2Y6RkxTeMLHytxeZ/4/BCmzR1LoZiKBq3m6nzcTJxj2eoCK4KTcOPSCe4 +lqn6rQu5x0yvdCEslEpkB+ZCBgIL+XmHGyEc/kNEir47DcPMkKQ7s+RfY0MACI55c 8PQRnFTyguHj3jYPWZt6TpF65KnCSJmtrcilFJR8=
Received: from [IPV6:2a02:1210:2c9b:e200:1c03:5f4:5b8:12bb] (0.1.2.1.2.0.a.2.dynamic.cust.swisscom.net [IPv6:2a02:1210:2c9b:e200:1c03:5f4:5b8:12bb] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-2) with ESMTPSA id 48H6e7eA1263473 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Sep 2024 08:40:08 +0200
Message-ID: <5360e85d-cf36-4ce4-88cc-3b41fee0d15e@lear.ch>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 08:40:07 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: "Werner, Thomas" <thomas-werner=40siemens.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "iot-directorate@ietf.org" <iot-directorate@ietf.org>
References: <172647660916.3956760.7441799022320718535@dt-datatracker-68b7b78cf9-q8rsp> <DB9PR10MB535565517E340A9CE781F7B1E7612@DB9PR10MB5355.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Autocrypt: addr=lear@lear.ch; keydata= xsBNBFMe1UQBCADdYOS5APDpIpF2ohAxB+nxg1GpAYr8iKwGIb86Wp9NkK5+QwbW9H035clT lpVLciExtN8E3MCTPOIm7aITPlruixAVwlBY3g7U9eRppSw9O2H/7bie2GOnYxqmsw4v1yNZ 9NcMLlD8raY0UcQ5r698c8JD4xUTLqybZXaK2sPeJkxzT+IwupRSQ+vXEvFFGhERQ88zo5Ca Sa1Gw/Rv54oH0Dq2XYkO41rhxQ60BKZLZuQK1d9+1y3I+An3AJeD3AA31fJZD3H8YRKOBgqe ILPILbw1mM7gCtCjfvFCt6AFCwEsjITGx55ceoQ+t5B5XGYJEppMWsIFrwZsfbL+gP31ABEB AAHNGUVsaW90IExlYXIgPGxlYXJAbGVhci5jaD7CwI4EEwECADgCGwMCHgECF4AWIQSY0L2Q Rh2wkqeyYR2HtmtG2dJ6MwUCWxJwMwULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQAKCRCHtmtG2dJ6M8KI B/46pFrJX+4Ockl2fHR303ais9Lyx8jv6mXKKOr8WR0UYcJ0syQrhaaZNG1VV98tYQHHK9F5 y7hH4YCsrr3odZ6zoavnx5X1X/2xw8y732f/irVoOOkYLid9IGPxa2e2nYXCZpde5/yvv3we XVE4mG4dEAD5T8iKS4Hz/3fKGJQ15o79Jv92HgC7RpCt0WaiQ0b6acP3PuwjDJzJzLFZzb7j IiB3izxQESSWE1GNRmoAK/k0gW6kmx1/87tQENrK+3Nn4CJSFQWF6entLnY7UeVm95wbMQkJ evwddDWUO2huDbmZnmxgKXGzSSpuNq7n8ICAOlbt0HfdJAZQfy25bwvezsBNBFMe1UQBCAC0 WV7Ydbv95xYGPhthTdChBIpPtl7JPCV/c6/3iEmvjpfGuFNaK4Macj9le20EA5A1BH7PgLGo HOiPM65NysRpZ96RRVX3TNfLmhGMFr5hPOGNdq+xcGHVutmwPV9U7bKeUNRiPFx3YdEkExdd qV2E8FltT0x2FSKe2xszPPHB6gVtMckX5buI9p1K3fbVhXdvEkcYY/jB0JEJGyhS5aEbct5c HUvDAkT81/YFK5Jfg8RRwu1q1t1YuIJSOWAZQ9J9oUsg6D9RpClU+tIFBoe3iTp1AUfJcypu cGKgLYKtpu/aygcpQONHYkYW5003mPsrajFhReVF5veycMbHs4u5ABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkF AlMe1UQCGwwACgkQh7ZrRtnSejOSuQgA27p2rYB7Kh20dym6V8c62pWpBHHTgxr/32zevxHS iXl6xvUCg5T8WUwfUk8OvgDcBErK/blDAMXQzSg3sp450JhR8RnXHXF5Zz2T04X7HnlIVJGw f2CjnwyEAJCqMzaCmI+g3Imvg/8L4nyBFvhlFHDv+kIvMiujyycjPAu7xxKplBs1/IEwmDoA MjneFmawvfeQnwdMhSKK8PjKSuzGU5uUmxj3GBfRqvTM0qpmhMPFOmDhJSmH55HLAky2Mlmq JYXJPt/9EfSEhFiua1M6gLiuNEuPkp+8jcnHQqKr0IeHt8UqcwLt2mGfIyl0FVdF9hvWPjNR zGbgqoT1Di03RQ==
In-Reply-To: <DB9PR10MB535565517E340A9CE781F7B1E7612@DB9PR10MB5355.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------zDnUEn7vjOHRracml1OcUJ0v"
Message-ID-Hash: QNLDZDJ5DFC3ZEAXWUNWZCMKSZBEZWJB
X-Message-ID-Hash: QNLDZDJ5DFC3ZEAXWUNWZCMKSZBEZWJB
X-MailFrom: lear@lear.ch
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Last-Call] Re: [Anima] Re: Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-12
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/P44juLoi0Ko1coQyyQ-1SKAF7hU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:last-call-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:last-call-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:last-call-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Thomas,

Again, congratulations on a well written document.  I'm not looking for 
the full blown use case, but just the input that produced that output.  
Test vectors.  That's it.

Thanks,

Eliot

On 17.09.2024 08:25, Werner, Thomas wrote:
>
> Thanks for your feedback, Eliot!
>
> With respect to the examples nits, the focus of 
> draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher is on voucher objects.
>
> More concrete use cases should be described in other specifications, 
> e.g., draft-ietf-anima-brski-prm
>
> Best regards
>
> Thomas
>
> *Von: *Eliot Lear via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
> *Datum: *Montag, 16. September 2024 um 10:50
> *An: *iot-directorate@ietf.org <iot-directorate@ietf.org>
> *Cc: *anima@ietf.org <anima@ietf.org>, 
> draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher.all@ietf.org 
> <draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher.all@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org 
> <last-call@ietf.org>
> *Betreff: *Iotdir last call review of draft-ietf-anima-jws-voucher-12
>
> Reviewer: Eliot Lear
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> This draft describes a JWS-protected RFC-8366 voucher.  It is well 
> written and
> clear.
>
> Major issues:
>
> None.
>
> Minor issues:
>
> None.
>
> Nits:
>
> I would prefer a more complete test vector in the examples.  That is, 
> could you
> provide the inputs that produced them?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Anima mailing list --anima@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email toanima-leave@ietf.org

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status