[Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-11
Joe Clarke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 28 September 2022 16:28 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietf.org
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4840C15257F; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joe Clarke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.17.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <166438252792.49026.16582113448138282229@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:28:47 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/P45xg4Qmmns7hm0dF_VmBhPCjJE>
Subject: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-otn-b100g-applicability-11
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 16:28:48 -0000
Reviewer: Joe Clarke Review result: Has Nits I have been tasked to review this document on behalf of the OPS DIR. I wouldn't say I'm an expert in this area, but overall I found the draft easy to read, and from an operations point of view I appreciate the succinct applicability summaries, as well as the points to future extensibility work (though I wonder if those deserve their own section for added clarity). On the nits side, I notice you compare your Figure 3 with the figure in Section 3 of RFC7138. However, you omit the notion of labeling the A, B, etc. with "OTN Switch", which I think would help. I'm also not sure what "3R" means here or in Figure 1 (but that is likely my lack of experience here). Finally, the two parts of Figure 3 seem to be showing both one-hop and multi-hop OTUCn links but you do not call that out as is done in RFC7138.
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf… Joe Clarke via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-… Radhakrishna Valiveti
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-… Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-… Radhakrishna Valiveti
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-… Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-… Radhakrishna Valiveti
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-… Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT/Vimercate)
- Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-… Radhakrishna Valiveti
- Re: [Last-Call] [CCAMP] Opsdir last call review o… Italo Busi
- Re: [Last-Call] [CCAMP] Opsdir last call review o… Radhakrishna Valiveti
- Re: [Last-Call] [CCAMP] Opsdir last call review o… wang.qilei