IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04

Nir Sopher <nirsopher@gmail.com> Tue, 06 December 2022 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <nirsopher@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D66C15C92B; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:23:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hXidk5gR13Ld; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BB4AC15C929; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 12:23:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com with SMTP id 7so20058900ybp.13; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:23:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=O4xZE7ERVEMlEBil9g3OFb68KweNGTpRqQc3LgCwZSU=; b=e42Ks/7rIt8lown1ZNoEQxV76HsBnIOxSBVCTWZCY5/+YCacWI7P2Lnj8XlW4Wwb9y OlaA0ycMOkvhfHyH6ZcfWltuCd49DG9dsthsiSjVfqnixAJdYYDExgnUbrEN7dsjrRSa nGPjaM/M7ZqsQehT0zvUf6k29IOYtMvjE6YF5f5hHixupwBmEiYqpRqpPZ4X5/m1npLO FAGnWqCaZxo8IImaljk/BiuarFzPNfLfNz522nw/p4RGkK9W68qQ/ucDhtvzSS17FWtw tF9fJP2Li3hjKpuf17ypNM1kyqYa+N7YTngyqKm5Cg1njiVxnV5IXYXRTAZZwpImRs2g ZaNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=O4xZE7ERVEMlEBil9g3OFb68KweNGTpRqQc3LgCwZSU=; b=n9JniPMNGOI+Z+c7L4MW882qXPLMbCbBtLRi5lI1CdvNTmC9LRBY1/Ij1Y513TvZzy KxZ2vTKTx87U8QSZr7a266xXaZRgb/jZQsPcP4mQ9+zUtHMwF6g55nnYI9BPOHVrJgjy PUriqX/phoygeIBwbOAljrYOU8GYhM3DaUbpekot8Nx2GqmfiGcVDsxnHGbtxzOl+mc0 UTtu4kiRfhmuRx8qa4pUez4fRszn9Hl+J/IIH8d7QwG2uNMx3h4gxblYT4YYvtipXyuU TMSjGfMTVJy0DVwbWcSgbtCc8SdyLXkfbOKrqesntzhyfCdWOCq13c5z/86norm5FqYg Fa2A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnczJdNyAVJ9xV29fvSdGlgBseqD2eoN0bcTpht3WBKnuPmMI4K T0Zi+FApmdnoQrK1FabxASrqTsZoGNxnt3zHbu0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5s0xPHApYXY0FQG+6uSBA78GZGjV1MsZGTAxdJVtLOevth2IsLMLYiRWHoBIxiQ57DoJAv9/L58rj+CANdgbU=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:b56:0:b0:6fe:85b9:2115 with SMTP id 83-20020a250b56000000b006fe85b92115mr15657333ybl.443.1670358219820; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 12:23:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <167031225206.26941.4986394051580707829@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <167031225206.26941.4986394051580707829@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Nir Sopher <nirsopher@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 22:23:28 +0200
Message-ID: <CACUa7-ti64nTrLzn=R4b0GWYg+bYsoy6ivk+jzfWF+zOtm3=Fw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
Cc: art@ietf.org, cdni@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000057111405ef2e947a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/ToTO8jXUQQobudhfPaWCrBIqo2A>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-additional-footprint-types-04
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 20:23:49 -0000

Hi Valery.
Thank you very much for your review and comments.
Following your comment we have changed the header title to be "CDNI
Additional Footprint Types".
Cheers :)
Sanjay and Nir

On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 9:37 AM Valery Smyslov via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Reviewer: Valery Smyslov
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned ART directorate reviewer for this document. These
> comments
> were written primarily for the benefit of the ART area directors.  Document
> editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last
> call
> comments.
>
> The document introduces two new CDNI Metadata Footprint Types in addition
> to
> those defined in RFC 8006. The document is well written and easy to
> understand.
> I found no issues related to ART area.
>
> Comment: it's a bit strange that document short title (which is repeated
> at the
> top of each page) is very generic: "Content Delivery Network
> Interconnection".
> I expected it to be more specific to the subject of the document, which
> only
> defines two additional types.
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email