Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-07

[CARLOS JESUS BERNARDOS CANO <[e-mail]>]

Thanks a lot Stewart for the comments.

Please see inline below how we have addressed them in version -08.

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:24 PM Stewart Bryant via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-raw-use-cases-07
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review Date: 2022-10-06
> IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-06
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
> Summary:
>
> A well written document ready for publication, but note the question on
> whether
> the aero terminology is correct and the comment on haptics.
>
> Major issues:
> None
>
> Minor issues:
>    Different safety levels need to be supported, from extremely safety
>    critical ones requiring low latency, such as a WAKE warning - a
>    warning that two aircraft come dangerously close to each other
> SB> Is this term correct?
> SB> Aircraft proximity is, I think, an AIRPROX event. WAKE I thought
> applied to
> the vortex trails whereby a large aircraft disturbs the air in a way that
> makes
> it unsafe for a smaller aircraft to fly through. It would be useful if an
> aero
> specialist validated the term.
>

[Carlos] That section was contributed by the LDACS experts, so I trust this
should be OK. In any case, I take the opportunity to request them to check
this.

>
> SB> In all the human interaction examples, I am surprised there is no
> mention
> of haptics. A latency failure in a haptic experience can make the
> participant
> feel nauseous and vomit.
>

[Carlos] Thanks, I have added a sentence to highlight this.

Thanks,

Carlos


>
> Nits/editorial comments:
> None
>
>
>