[ldapext] request that ldap-pkcs9 be in LDAP charter scope, or not

Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> Wed, 09 September 2015 23:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD3D1ACE14 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DI5_ny5A9e86 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A54201B47E7 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smize.t-mobile.com (unknown []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40D51509BE for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 19:37:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5357AA16-7C1A-479A-BB90-59BD3849D998"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
Message-Id: <3A5FE984-B3FD-44E2-A377-4186631DDF0B@seantek.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:37:09 -0700
To: ldapext@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/4jDVOSTQk6YV0E6w4RgRels7FTM>
Subject: [ldapext] request that ldap-pkcs9 be in LDAP charter scope, or not
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 23:37:58 -0000


Last year I proposed draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9 (just refreshed today). Since the most recent thread on this list is about resurrecting LDAP work at IETF, I would like to request (and discuss) that the LDAP PKCS #9 draft be included in the charter scope.

Or not. If not, then I will pursue other avenues to get the descriptors registered (which may require no publication at all). However, Barry suggested that the LDAP community should be in the loop about it, so here we are. Let's discuss; thanks.



Name:		draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9
Revision:	03
Title:		Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Registrations for PKCS #9
Document date:	2015-09-09
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		8
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-03.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-03
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-03

  PKCS #9 includes several useful definitions that are not yet
  reflected in the LDAP IANA registry. This document adds those
  definitions to the IANA registry.