IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ldapext] request that ldap-pkcs9 be in LDAP charter scope, or not

Ludovic Poitou <ludovic.poitou@gmail.com> Thu, 10 September 2015 08:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ludovic.poitou@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E6F1B63F2 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WcA7Gn3PBX_c for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B96371B63E8 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so13803942wic.1 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-type; bh=7nnQSjLa+H/aA44gHkRwRK+Ry1NvjlU1cyiFAEBOV5w=; b=WtRg4eYWXzAiVaFbYciBcsAdXIbWq+WVb1P9bfBNznyYtz2sSTom2oZALkuBxiOQJ4 sN5Zllx/bCj7Jmgv2DRnSqAMonvw6reYby+J2Dqi4Gzz3P0Ht8+ca1779lIturd/DSns 3UHBxtz2Fqmnozas8i/BX+HF5OZh98AOg7Gq3/XOX/7nryQD1HitlgpqWrqUW6QjlLc0 YxMuu4upFm9Naieu0rfhJorJgtHHDtIXMzxNhbBT9B/IWaqNzSnzLEpLGNt94UIIA6bC AsT2kBQyE71/T8euZBFpg4+dxF/zFR4tQw3f1xCmUH+ZrVmigV8Ajev25wx7UM8UWbE6 4rjA==
X-Received: by 10.180.83.137 with SMTP id q9mr3861644wiy.68.1441872014179; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:00:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lpm.local ([46.218.40.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id wj4sm724679wjb.10.2015.09.10.01.00.13 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Sep 2015 01:00:13 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:00:12 +0200
From: Ludovic Poitou <ludovic.poitou@gmail.com>
To: ldapext@ietf.org, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Message-ID: <etPan.55f1388d.1efb7ab6.278@lpm.local>
In-Reply-To: <3A5FE984-B3FD-44E2-A377-4186631DDF0B@seantek.com>
References: <3A5FE984-B3FD-44E2-A377-4186631DDF0B@seantek.com>
X-Mailer: Airmail Beta (326)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="55f1388d_634d006c_278"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/JP-CU4abNFuKfODGmORm7woV61w>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] request that ldap-pkcs9 be in LDAP charter scope, or not
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:00:18 -0000

Hi Sean,

Thanks for reaching out, I will take your request in consideration as we are starting to draft a WG charter to bring back LDAP work at IETF.

Regards,

Ludovic

-- 
Ludovic Poitou
http://ludopoitou.com

From: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Reply: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Date: 10 Sep 2015 at 01:38:44
To: ldapext@ietf.org <ldapext@ietf.org>
Subject:  [ldapext] request that ldap-pkcs9 be in LDAP charter scope, or not  

Hello,  

Last year I proposed draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9 (just refreshed today). Since the most recent thread on this list is about resurrecting LDAP work at IETF, I would like to request (and discuss) that the LDAP PKCS #9 draft be included in the charter scope.  

Or not. If not, then I will pursue other avenues to get the descriptors registered (which may require no publication at all). However, Barry suggested that the LDAP community should be in the loop about it, so here we are. Let's discuss; thanks.  

Sean  

***  

Name:	draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9  
Revision:	03  
Title:	Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Registrations for PKCS #9  
Document date:	2015-09-09  
Group:	Individual Submission  
Pages:	8  
URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-03.txt  
Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9/  
Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-03  
Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-03  

Abstract:  
PKCS #9 includes several useful definitions that are not yet  
reflected in the LDAP IANA registry. This document adds those  
definitions to the IANA registry.  
_______________________________________________  
Ldapext mailing list  
Ldapext@ietf.org  
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email