Re: [ldapext] Fwd: Manual Post Requested for draft-howard-rfc2307bis

[Howard Chu <[e-mail]>]

Ralf Haferkamp wrote:
> Am Sonntag 09 August 2009 23:41:42 schrieb Howard Chu:
>> I guess this will show up in a couple of days.
>>
>> Major differences from version 01 of the rfc2307bis document:
>>
>> 1) Added host and hostos attribute options to allow system-specific values
>>   for attributes when needed. (E.g. to accommodate different homeDirectory
>>   locations on various machines.)
>>
>> 2) Added integerOrderingMatch ORDERING rules to attributes with integer
>> syntax. Admins frequently need to search for things like (uidNumber>=1000)
>>   and the lack of the ORDERING rules was a great impediment.
>>
>> 3) Added new groupOfMembers structural objectclass with "member" as an
>> optional attribute, to support groups with zero members. This class should
>>   be used whenever a structural group class is needed. The use of
>> groupOfUniqueNames (and groupOfNames) is deprecated.
>
> I wonder if it might be better to leave details about which structural
> objectclass should be used for groups out of this document. For implementors
> it should be enough to know that "member" is used for group members and
> "posixGroup" is the auxillary objectclass to look for.
> The definition of groupOfMembers might then better be handled in a separate
> document. As I think it is useful of other purposes than described here as
> well.

Right. Given the long discussion about group objectclasses we had on this list 
a while back, it's obviously something that has further effects. I had 
forgotten if there was any conclusion to those discussions when I was editing 
this draft, and only remembered it afterward.

> Additionally I wonder if the "memberUid" Attribute should be removed
> completely or at least be documented as being deprecated.

-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/