IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ldapext] DBIS commentary

Charlie <medievalist@gmail.com> Tue, 01 December 2015 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <medievalist@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED801A9037 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:06:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MALFORMED_FREEMAIL=1.488, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBkBPFWvdzqi for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:06:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 835E21A8F37 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:06:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lfdl133 with SMTP id l133so27332621lfd.2 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 14:06:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=oViZNFpXOVpAGxhspN4ErbPpvYjlll4E94FcZpcd2JA=; b=0OjKukKfIFMnfLe9tNdrbFuwF+UjLpwhjMU9bnhiW+BpAi4fcFgNwp5XHEwtP8Qsye NWRgVZeAViZUa0hPs7YI+P2jxn0bUtDYJkdRb6sKwcyeofloV2mtnjqzUkHbxUuN6vec OILgXk7zkR1a6+zo6fhl4A6ieaoonFyATM1p8IWa1rnvor1gaLn63BFAbLsc48XoVMkf GlddWtjYYL1K5vx05Bu6NtHMH9fEn106eqD+PKY+dhP7YLux+dHyaj2T1t2JH+VHvC4z icA5Pt13Zq3WdRlM3/qpxZ6yIDz4rHfevPwSwSRJMS1eG5l3pvC+8fFSArcs+RvFtJ9j HH3w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.29.205 with SMTP id d196mr27034196lfd.81.1449007601651; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 14:06:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.80.193 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:06:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <565DDE78.5030908@oracle.com>
References: <5655E4F0.7030809@oracle.com> <814F4E458AA9FF4E89CF1A9EDA0DE2A932F618A3@OZWEX0209N1.msad.ms.com> <565CAC30.6010701@oracle.com> <814F4E458AA9FF4E89CF1A9EDA0DE2A932F8EAFD@OZWEX0209N2.msad.ms.com> <565DDE78.5030908@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 17:06:41 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJb3uA4-PE+QQvhzZ45NQzsNiTw=Hg_EuoA8JE3uH+iTLGTrqQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charlie <medievalist@gmail.com>
Cc: "ldapext@ietf.org" <ldapext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/OyvV4zY4hWQhShz5AKYsAlSpRtI>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] DBIS commentary
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2015 22:06:44 -0000

A directory backend that is intended to serve multiple existing
operating systems probably shouldn't be telling any of those operating
systems whether or not they should be case-sensitive.  It's out of
scope for the project and causes arguments.

That being said, options are great to have.  If you can support
existing systems while also giving people the ability to do whatever
you happen to think is better, you'll automatically win any such
arguments.

--Charlie

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status