[ledbat] LEDBAT doesn't help sharing network beyond home gateway
Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com> Thu, 28 July 2011 23:19 UTC
Return-Path: <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
X-Original-To: ledbat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ledbat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30EA21F8B7B for <ledbat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.938
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.938 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.408, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.069, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KH8ueHrlL9NZ for <ledbat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.smtp.bt.com (smtp1.smtp.bt.com [217.32.164.137]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530FA11E811E for <ledbat@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i2kc06-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.70]) by smtp1.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:19:43 +0100
Received: from cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com ([147.149.196.177]) by i2kc06-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:19:43 +0100
Received: From bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk ([132.146.168.158]) by cbibipnt05.iuser.iroot.adidom.com (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.399); id 131189518219; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:19:42 +0100
Received: from MUT.jungle.bt.co.uk ([10.73.64.22]) by bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk (8.13.5/8.12.8) with ESMTP id p6SNJd8F022546; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:19:40 +0100
Message-Id: <201107282319.p6SNJd8F022546@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:23:44 -0400
To: Janardhan Iyengar <jana.iyengar@gmail.com>
From: Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 132.146.168.158
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2011 23:19:43.0474 (UTC) FILETIME=[D52DE520:01CC4D7C]
Cc: "ledbat@ietf.org" <ledbat@ietf.org>, tsv-area IETF list <tsv-area@ietf.org>
Subject: [ledbat] LEDBAT doesn't help sharing network beyond home gateway
X-BeenThere: ledbat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of the LEDBAT WG <ledbat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ledbat>, <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ledbat>
List-Post: <mailto:ledbat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat>, <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 23:19:46 -0000
Jana, You asked the basis of what I just said in TSVAREA. I said in a residential network, LEDBAT won't yield to traffic sharing any queue upstream of your own home gateway queue. LEDBAT's target delay is 150ms. A typical shared link in such a network will be 1Gb/s. 150ms of queuing into a 1Gb/s link is 12,500 packets of queue (if 1500B per pkt). The buffer will not be this big (unless there's more bloat than anyone would expect)! Therefore LEDBAT will drive the queue off the end of its tail, just like TCP does. Therefore LEDAT is not designed to yield to others in such a queue into a higher speed link. The root cause is the fixed 150ms target delay. Nonetheless, I believe this design choice makes sense for LEDBAT _today_: you only yield to others in your own home. You don't yield to others in other homes. If LEDBAT yielded to others, users would reject it. Evidence is on the Bittorrent community postings when uTP was 'imposed' on BitTorrent users - it was only accepted because it was shown that performance didn't suffer unless it was yielding to self. We could design a LEDBAT-like protocol that yields to others in any queue. But no-one would want it (yet). Incidentally, a goal of ConEx is to incentivise deployment of LEDBAT-like protocols. The suffix '-like' means that they would benefit from yielding to anyone, not just your family in your home. Bob ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe, BT Innovate & Design
- [ledbat] LEDBAT doesn't help sharing network beyo… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [ledbat] LEDBAT doesn't help sharing network … Rolf Winter
- Re: [ledbat] LEDBAT doesn't help sharing network … Murari Sridharan
- Re: [ledbat] LEDBAT doesn't help sharing network … Sampo Syreeni
- Re: [ledbat] LEDBAT doesn't help sharing network … arvid
- Re: [ledbat] LEDBAT doesn't help sharing network … Woundy, Richard