[lemonade] Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt

In Section 4 (Response Codes), do we really mean "may return a 
response code"?  I think "SHOULD return a response code" would be 
better, but in any case it is not clear if "may" is intended to be 
normative.

In Section 4.1 (BADURL Response), it is not clear if "invalid" means 
syntactically or semantically regarding UIDs and body parts.  That 
is, is this response code to be used if the syntax is bad or if the 
referenced item does not exist?

in Section 4.2 (TOOBIG Response), "The server may also wish to 
return" perhaps would be more clear written normatively, as "The 
server MAY return".

Also, in the super nit-pick category, line 190 has "e.g." which 
should be "e.g.," (it needs a comma).
-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly-selected tag: ---------------
To die for an idea is unquestionably noble. But how much nobler it
would be if men died for ideas that were true!
    --H.L. Mencken

_______________________________________________
lemonade mailing list
lemonade@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade