Re: [lemonade] Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt
Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com> Fri, 29 July 2005 20:44 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dybil-00044S-2R; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:44:43 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dybih-00042q-DP; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:44:41 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA08219; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:44:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from warlock.qualcomm.com ([129.46.50.49]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DycEP-0005LA-Vo; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:17:27 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (vpn-10-50-16-80.qualcomm.com [10.50.16.80]) by warlock.qualcomm.com (8.12.10/8.12.5/1.0) with ESMTP id j6TKiHoZ011808; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p07000c00bf104296b897@[192.168.1.13]>
In-Reply-To: <200507270259.j6R2xdVd026396@lab.smi.sendmail.com>
References: <p07000c1dbf0c94eddef2@[192.168.1.13]> <200507270259.j6R2xdVd026396@lab.smi.sendmail.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X v7.0a
X-message-flag: Using Outlook? Upgrade to Eudora: <http://www.eudora.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:34:59 -0700
To: Philip Guenther <guenther+lemonade@sendmail.com>
From: Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [lemonade] Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-catenate-05.txt
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336
Cc: presnick@qualcomm.com, Lemonade <lemonade@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: lemonade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments <lemonade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:lemonade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: lemonade-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: lemonade-bounces@ietf.org
At 7:59 PM -0700 7/26/05, Philip Guenther wrote: > Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com> writes: >>In Section 4 (Response Codes), do we really mean "may return a >>response code"? I think "SHOULD return a response code" would be >>better, but in any case it is not clear if "may" is intended to be >>normative. > > The catenate draft does reference RFC 2119 or otherwise define > particular words in uppercase as having special normative meaning. > Changing that sentence to use "SHOULD" (or "MAY") would require many > other changes to the draft to keep it consistent. On reflection, I > agree with the author's choice to use normal English prose and let the > words speak for themselves. No, really, we can use the words "may", > "should", and "must" as other than normative baseball bats to beat > implementors with. I hadn't noticed the lack of RFC 2119 reference. Interesting to have a standards-track document with no normative language. By the way, I've written a few documents that use normative language, and as far as I know have never used such language as a bat or other implement of beating. > > With regards to that particular sentence, I read it as being > descriptive, acting as an introduction to the subsections that follow. > > >>In Section 4.1 (BADURL Response), it is not clear if "invalid" means >>syntactically or semantically regarding UIDs and body parts. That >>is, is this response code to be used if the syntax is bad or if the >>referenced item does not exist? > > Given the first sentence of the subsection, it is obviously meant to > apply to *all* cases where a supplied URL cannot be resolved to a chunk > of text to include. Perhaps the second sentence should be changed to > start "Some possible reasons..." to make it clear that the list is _not_ > exhaustive. OK. -- Randall Gellens Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only -------------- Randomly-selected tag: --------------- Anyone can do any amount of work provided it isn't the work he is supposed to be doing at the moment. --Robert Benchley _______________________________________________ lemonade mailing list lemonade@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade
- [lemonade] Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-catena… Randall Gellens
- Re: [lemonade] Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-ca… Philip Guenther
- Re: [lemonade] Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-ca… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [lemonade] Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-ca… Randall Gellens