[lemonade] Re: Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-compress-04.txt

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@oryx.com> Sun, 24 September 2006 12:56 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRTWi-00064B-HW; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:56:08 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPn9c-0000n3-Ua for lemonade@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:29:20 -0400
Received: from kalyani.oryx.com ([195.30.37.30]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GPn1l-0002iR-9N for lemonade@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:21:15 -0400
Received: from libertango.oryx.com (libertango.oryx.com [195.30.37.9]) by kalyani.oryx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C954AC98; Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:20:59 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <5dFWgVboL6PP45oMnCVmgw.md5@libertango.oryx.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:22:16 +0200
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@oryx.com>
To: lemonade@ietf.org
References: <E1GPKRe-0004A0-AN@stiedprstage1.ietf.org> <p06240608c1360aaad09d@[loud.qualcomm.com]>
In-Reply-To: <p06240608c1360aaad09d@[loud.qualcomm.com]>
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 08:56:08 -0400
Cc: Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com>
Subject: [lemonade] Re: Comments on draft-ietf-lemonade-compress-04.txt
X-BeenThere: lemonade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments <lemonade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:lemonade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade>, <mailto:lemonade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: lemonade-bounces@ietf.org

Randall Gellens writes:
> This version looks terrific.
>
> Two minor things:
>
> (1) In Section 4 (Compression Efficiency), I'd suggest changing:
>
>     clients which send many APPEND commands may want to
>     surround large literals with flushes in the same way as is
>     recommended for server below.
>
> in two ways:
>
> (1a) change "server" to "servers"

Of course.

> (1b) change "below" to "in Section 4, Compression Efficiency".

Really? It's the same section. Perhaps "in this section" or something?

> (2) In Section 7 (IANA Considerations), "another compression" should 
> be "another compression mechanism".

Of course.

Arnt

_______________________________________________
lemonade mailing list
lemonade@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade