[Lime] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-11: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 25 October 2017 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: lime@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C52013F3D0; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods@ietf.org, Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@cisco.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, lime-chairs@ietf.org, cpignata@cisco.com, lime@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.63.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150894439333.4826.10990964653413411779.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 08:13:13 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/V-NzB-2iDyoyKsgLvGW9nT5E7P8>
Subject: [Lime] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:13:13 -0000

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There is an outstanding issue stemming from the Gen-ART review concerning
whether two-way delay is supported and whether it would be signaled by
specifying TWAMP as the protocol-id. This should be resolved before the
document gets published.