Re: [Lime] WGLC: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-00
顾 戎 <gurong_cmcc@outlook.com> Mon, 06 February 2017 09:25 UTC
Return-Path: <gurong_cmcc@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76496129CC9 for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 01:25:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7xXRmzkeoxnA for <lime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 01:25:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SNT004-OMC2S43.hotmail.com (snt004-omc2s43.hotmail.com [65.54.61.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7BFB129CC7 for <lime@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 01:25:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.90.71]) by SNT004-OMC2S43.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 6 Feb 2017 01:25:07 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=uW9/CYRP/MwGKDC8QMArgyiI0m446m3JvIpBQUrQAQM=; b=M9f7kO5sTdKHsnx26etwHoXL8oGj9OAb++2TLHg6RwbP/MChfydNomZQJCIyH7Nc+3t371dBa/dW98xlzcQOLIjiH47SUikA/VrS4JzQiboTgpAoNzRJPWi5C2M8XaDfBIL9+SW86O/VLKqymw0zykHfckw79g6k2rYxOY+UJThuDvTTVJwKJ/m2SE9cePzmL3o1ZfjjAC/xl+3QvI5a5+w9sr/LZY/YM3QnGrudezh0yX4OXb3iZ6QUwYELPQTZhLgwlbtnLiAU2G7JmRu7vk55HTZXAaEqfndYrcSUcLJXLI8MgoaDOfBrBwbHge0Y4oafAn2yVCIQjyaCsHHS6w==
Received: from SG2APC01FT044.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.51) by SG2APC01HT048.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.251.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.874.2; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:24:45 +0000
Received: from KL1PR0201MB1656.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.250.55) by SG2APC01FT044.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.239) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.874.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:24:45 +0000
Received: from KL1PR0201MB1656.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.58.150]) by KL1PR0201MB1656.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.58.150]) with mapi id 15.01.0874.026; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:24:45 +0000
From: 顾 戎 <gurong_cmcc@outlook.com>
To: "lime@ietf.org" <lime@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RE:[Lime] WGLC: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-00
Thread-Index: AQHSgFMD9VntdXqT/U2w14q6rLjktQ==
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 09:24:45 +0000
Message-ID: <KL1PR0201MB165652E246C7D98C65C28E808B400@KL1PR0201MB1656.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: juniper.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;juniper.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=outlook.com;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:ED94004B059312AFC581C05CE714712718A9AF54182CAE1B99686EAF9B366FCD; UpperCasedChecksum:A8721FBF6C5A20056CC51D8DF82A26E1A5004DF3FB5E956A8A0D19F3A3ED2895; SizeAsReceived:7662; Count:37
x-tmn: [ehTmZ5Mx9Nx/1HoZCiywDy/ycuxHEYn1]
x-incomingheadercount: 37
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SG2APC01HT048; 5:yXbAoRyMGM14JpXjEFRdB3jIC0h/GLnefczlQo1TruEXZOuiZOTwMinKwMsvqXobTf/WjI/oRYMh5O9UkVgPc6UMxLoGyFKwK4j2wCStyNJxYcNO4hB8YB5+1tMjpLCm8dM6c625LbS4QbSiVkjsObf375Bf+Foo679b4oN/eKU=; 24:vWR52KZE0eZukk9IotRa+61o5wVo0xFDvCl6a6Mn3rztG13UJ4VjxDYQXCPyiItOmt2UIyQ7JgngvsR5hcCtzgArm8LZPeXZcqO855E9uZk=; 7: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
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SG2APC01HT048; H:KL1PR0201MB1656.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 71870e6b-9402-4a53-bc09-08d44e71fd80
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(5061506426)(5061507331)(1603103135)(1601125107)(1603101373)(1701031045); SRVR:SG2APC01HT048;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444111334)(432015086)(82015046); SRVR:SG2APC01HT048; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SG2APC01HT048;
x-forefront-prvs: 0210479ED8
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_KL1PR0201MB165652E246C7D98C65C28E808B400KL1PR0201MB1656_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Feb 2017 09:24:45.6332 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SG2APC01HT048
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Feb 2017 09:25:07.0488 (UTC) FILETIME=[E7FFD200:01D2805A]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/_iHiuMk5IE32HoG3Zb7JFKWvbH8>
Cc: "rbonica@juniper.net" <rbonica@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [Lime] WGLC: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-00
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 09:25:09 -0000
Hi, dear all. I have read this document. Here are some tiny comments. After that, I think this document may be ready to move forward. (1) Section 5 Security Considerations I think security consideration can be referred to the draft-ietf-lime-yang-oam-model instead of TBD. (2) Section 6 Maybe the new text of "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-connectionless-oam-methods" can replace the old one "URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-connectionless-oam" Besides , about RFC6020 "name: ietf-connectionless-oam-methods namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-connectionless-oam-methods prefix: coam-methods reference: RFC XXXX " may as well replace "name: ietf-connectionless-oam namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-connectionless-oam prefix: goam reference: RFC XXXX". Best regards. Gu Rong gurong_cmcc@outlook.com gurong@chinamobile.com -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Lime [mailto:lime-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Ron Bonica 发送时间: 2017年1月26日 23:12 收件人: lime@ietf.org<mailto:lime@ietf.org> 主题: [Lime] WGLC: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-00 Folks, This message begins a WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-00. Please submit your comments by February 9, 2017. Ron