[Lime] 答复: AD review: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam
Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Fri, 01 September 2017 11:46 UTC
Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCF4132D63; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 04:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y44jVyv6fD6a; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 04:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A9C8132D53; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 04:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DNS58024; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 11:46:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 12:46:34 +0100
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.219]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 1 Sep 2017 19:46:29 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: bclaise <bclaise@cisco.com>
CC: lime <lime@ietf.org>, camoberg <camoberg@cisco.com>, akatlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, janl <janl@tail-f.com>, "rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org" <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lime] AD review: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam
Thread-Index: AQHTIxfyMyzRbC6lkEqf3lC+DLVbDw==
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 11:46:28 +0000
Message-ID: <etPan.59a94893.327b23c6.255d@Qin-Wude-iPhone>
References: <ce63b3cd-a45e-dbe2-7522-acbc4272a33d@cisco.com> <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABA9AAEB702@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>, <0b17110b-e307-3fb8-a96d-90c7698357de@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0b17110b-e307-3fb8-a96d-90c7698357de@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_etPan59a94893327b23c6255dQinWudeiPhone_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090201.59A9489B.002E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.219, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 689cc7f0a6f96ff8056c2aff6df58f02
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lime/fbN9d4_N9h8DAuxAqFWWwGhylVQ>
Subject: [Lime] 答复: AD review: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam
X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." <lime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lime/>
List-Post: <mailto:lime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lime>, <mailto:lime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 11:46:40 -0000
Good comments, will update based on your comments and suggestion. Sent from HUAWEI AnyOffice 发件人: bclaise 收件人: Qin Wu; 抄送: lime@ietf.org; Carl Moberg (camoberg); akatlas; Jan Lindblad; Routing WG; 主题: Re: [Lime] AD review: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam 时间: 2017-09-01 19:18:09 Thanks Qin See in-line. Thanks for AD Review. We have addressed your comments in v-(09) together with other comments. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam/ Just to clarify, ‘tp-tools’ grouping defined in CL model support both proactive and on demand activation. Grouping defined for common session statistics on support proactive activation. We have made this clear in the text. Also it is intentional to separate retrieval- data from retrieval procedure, the rationale is clarified in the introduction 1, last paragraph of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods. -Qin 发件人: Lime [mailto:lime-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Benoit Claise 发送时间: 2017年8月11日 23:11 抄送: lime@ietf.org<mailto:lime@ietf.org>; Carl Moberg (camoberg); Alia Atlas 主题: [Lime] AD review: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam Dear all, Here is my AD review. - To define a forwarding treatment of a test packet, the 'tp-address' needs to be associated with additional parameters, e.g. DSCP for IP or TC for MPLS. TC? I'm still used to EXP, and had to look TC up. Quoting the Internet (so it can't be wrong): Based on RFC5462, the EXP bit has been renamed to Traffic Class field. TC name is not uses widely. The point was not to change TC to EXP, but to write: DSCP for IP or EXP (renamed to Traffic Classic in RFC5462) for MPLS. <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types/> - You included: The model is augmented to "/nd:networks/nd:network/nd:node" using 'test-point-locations' defined below. 'tp-tools' grouping defined in this model supports both proactive and on-demand activation. But unless you provide a draft reference, it doesn't make sense. I had to check the YANG itself to discover the assigned prefix: import ietf-network { prefix nd; } And then lookup ietf-network - I see a "typedef route-distinguisher" in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types/ It's more complete that your leaf route-distinguisher, uint64. At this point, I believe you should import it. There are maybe other types you might want to import. Some new editorial comments: - indicatesindicate - format.Each Regards, Benoit
- [Lime] AD review: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connection… Benoit Claise
- Re: [Lime] AD review: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connec… Qin Wu
- Re: [Lime] AD review: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connec… Benoit Claise
- [Lime] 答复: AD review: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connec… Qin Wu
- Re: [Lime] AD review: draft-ietf-lime-yang-connec… Qin Wu