Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION - canonical

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 03 June 2011 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEBAE07D4 for <link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.579
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PUoF-pq1+Ig2 for <link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA38E07AB for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-158.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-158.cisco.com [64.101.72.158]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18F8740046; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:36:40 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4DE945D6.4020500@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:36:38 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <BANLkTikDYGMKinQh1xFKfQFVjaoSDcX0KA@mail.gmail.com> <4DA88EA7.3060405@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4DA88EA7.3060405@gmx.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms080500050908070306060100"
Cc: link-relations <link-relations@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION - canonical
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:36:42 -0000

On 4/15/11 12:29 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 15.04.2011 20:09, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>> Relation Name: canonical
>> Description:   A "canonical" URI is the preferred version of a set of
>> URIs
>>                 with highly similar content.  It is intended to help
>> search
>>                 engines when the same or highly similar similar
>> content is
>>                 available at different URIs.
>> Reference:     About rel="canonical"
>>                
>> http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394
>> Notes:         In<http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/canonical-link-tag/>  and
>>                 <http://gregable.com/2009/02/relcanonical.html>  the
>> authors
>>                 state that Ask, Bing, Google, and Yahoo supported
>> canonical
>>                 URIs as of February, 2009.
> 
> Frank,
> 
> we do have people at Google looking into writing a "proper" spec --
> maybe you are willing to assist them, given your IETF know-how?

I'd be happy to sponsor the old spec if someone can volunteer to work on it:

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-johnston-addressing-link-relations-01.txt

It is very short and quite complete, so I think it would be easy to move
this forward.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/