Re: [link-relations] An Internet Draft template for writing a Link Relation specification

[Tim Williams <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for this Julian, this seems much more approachable.  I'm
curious about process with these.

I gather there's two things that need to occur:  1) an Informational
RFC through the Independent Submission process and 2) A mail here to
ask for it to be added to the registry.

What's the process for getting these reviewed/discussing prior to 1?
Would it be appropriate to turn this mailing-list into a place for
discussing candidate link relation types - with an appropriate subject
label (e.g. [PROPOSAL])?  Or is it typical to just submit it directly
to through the form?

Thanks,
--tim

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Julian Reschke <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to make it easier to write an Internet Draft defining a Link Relation (with
> the goal of publishing as RFC), I have created a small template.
>
> It uses the RFC2629-syntax, as consumed by xml2rfc.tcl (web service at
> xml.resource.org) and rfc2629.xslt
> (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/rfc2629xslt.html>). (*)
>
> Additional material:
>
> Slides created by the RFC Production Center:
> <ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc-editor/lifecycle79.pdf> and
> <ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc-editor/tutorial.latest.pdf>
>
> "Guidelines to Authors of Internet-Drafts":
> <http://www.ietf.org/id-info/guidelines.html>
>
> Feedback about the template appreciated...
>
> Julian
>
> (*) For RFC2629/xml2rfc related questions, the best place to start is
> <http://lists.xml.resource.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc>; feel free to cc me
> on questions.
>