IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02

"Gregg Schudel (gschudel)" <gschudel@cisco.com> Thu, 29 January 2015 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <gschudel@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C591A034F for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:27:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bWbSpXxYOxkG for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:27:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DF221A0362 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:27:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1893; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1422534446; x=1423744046; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=LbJIH2Hefp+s7gAFJeAzHZx7E4wsP5ODR1iyjGpBE+Q=; b=Xse7za/hmw0WFMDjt65tg4vmONfnX+PSuTw7Sz5gaHEwGK/eeJBkJ6LW TZsvzy9Szn3bEq7ohR1rD9Z4bjE1xjaDeGBVEt0Vwq1tgYRU5cGOyF2s5 njb9LzvKLSUrCMbmLjKMDdlGP+1kbaRQpiVMqU0zl498yY8yASsevSjeh c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlEFABgmylStJV2T/2dsb2JhbABXA4MGUlkExE4KhXECgR9DAQEBAQF9hAwBAQEDAQEBAWsBCgULAgEIGC4nCyUCBA4FiCQIDdYHAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF48WEQEdIxACBRGDBYETBYVGiS6JIpJGIoNubwGBCjl+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,485,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="391813624"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2015 12:27:25 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0TCRP4D002079 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:27:25 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.211]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:27:25 -0600
From: "Gregg Schudel (gschudel)" <gschudel@cisco.com>
To: IETF <lisp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02
Thread-Index: AQHQO6wWho31p8N2iECWirwThCtfSZzXaxiA
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:27:25 +0000
Message-ID: <F5970268-467E-4932-B90A-86A3DD557505@cisco.com>
References: <270570EF-D42E-41DA-8848-1510A2E32D27@gmail.com> <54C2CD91.50906@cisco.com> <54CA0777.6040200@lispmob.org>
In-Reply-To: <54CA0777.6040200@lispmob.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.24.117.98]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <BB56E0EDDEE38141BB6646038AEA90CA@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/-H1-r9LPoeXP0qpCAK4hZvmCPWw>
Subject: Re: [lisp] draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:27:29 -0000

+1
it’s been deployed for several years and very stable (and simple to work with).
I support this going to last call.



On Jan 29, 2015, at 11:12 AM, Lori Jakab <lori@lispmob.org> wrote:

> On 01/24/2015 12:39 AM, Fabio Maino wrote:
>> Agree. It was recently refreshed from expiration, and I believe it's
>> ready for last call.
> 
> +1
> 
> There are several implementations, that have been thoroughly tested for
> interoperability, so I support this document going into working group
> last call.
> 
> -Lori
> 
>> 
>> Fabio
>> 
>> On 1/23/15 9:25 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>> I would like to ask the working group if there are any issues with
>>> draft-ietf-lisp-ddt-02 and if there is any reason to not send this
>>> document for working group last call?
>>> 
>>> It has been around for a while, has good implementation and deployment
>>> support and hasn't been presented in a working group meeting for a while.
>>> 
>>> Dino
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lisp mailing list
>>> lisp@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Best regards,
Gregg

--------------------------------------------------------------------
.:|:.:|:. | gregg schudel (ccie#9591) LISP technical marketing engr
  cisco   | mobile: +1 571 332 2222   email: gschudel@cisco.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
cisco corporate legal statement: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email