[lisp] John Scudder's No Objection on charter-ietf-lisp-04-06: (with COMMENT)

John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 04 January 2024 00:47 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082E9C14F6B0; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:47:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.1.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Message-ID: <170432924700.24919.10668956158788021840@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 16:47:27 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/2sQ0x9TZ8m1B1VOBGTPf1tpHjag>
Subject: [lisp] John Scudder's No Objection on charter-ietf-lisp-04-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:47:27 -0000

John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-lisp-04-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

“LISP deployments could benefit from more advanced internet-working”

Should this be “interworking”? If not, why not?

Editorial:

s/identified by the working as main LISP applications/identified by the working
group as main LISP applications/ (add “group”)

s/The management of LISP protocol and deployments include data models, OAM/The
management of LISP protocol and deployments including data models, OAM/
(“include” should be “including”)

s/LISP tunnel endpoints are separated from by a NAT/LISP tunnel endpoints are
separated from one another by a NAT/ (add “one another”)

s/leveraging on/leveraging/ (remove “on”)