[lisp] Roman Danyliw's Block on charter-ietf-lisp-04-06: (with BLOCK and COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 03 January 2024 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2859FC14F5ED; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 13:14:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: lisp-chairs@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.1.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <170431647814.62985.15974782567928382830@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 13:14:38 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/d6VQL8Wdvf2MnBzTXL549rs4Jxo>
Subject: [lisp] Roman Danyliw's Block on charter-ietf-lisp-04-06: (with BLOCK and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 21:14:38 -0000

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-lisp-04-06: Block

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
BLOCK:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the following set of work "Privacy and Security: The WG will work on EID
anonymity, VPN segmentation leveraging on the Instance ID, and traffic
anonymization. The reuse of existing mechanisms will be prioritized.":

-- What is the threat model assumed for "traffic anonymization" and "EID
anonymity"?  Could the desired security properties be clarified?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the following set of work "Privacy and Security: The WG will work on EID
anonymity, VPN segmentation leveraging on the Instance ID, and traffic
anonymization. The reuse of existing mechanisms will be prioritized.":

-- What will the output of this work look like?  Which milestone is it
associated with?