Re: [lisp] Roman Danyliw's Block on charter-ietf-lisp-04-06: (with BLOCK and COMMENT)

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Mon, 22 January 2024 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048D1C14F6E3 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 01:29:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gigix-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k1B-wHxNzb0V for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 01:29:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ED44C14F699 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 01:29:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40e86a9fc4bso38335905e9.2 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 01:29:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gigix-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1705915753; x=1706520553; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sJoY6+VTogcF3M4Xg9rC9QVVqdj/s9EuJ/zKuAJoY5s=; b=EE6DNtxqFZxDVfZo9oOXgEAy9tfHl5huwJVu2TiFOUhGgaPSq7CsMEcenEvr/IIhJe tv5rHzZ89B6ib7e6VMsT/L/rXSEz03apvD/SjeHU3+BjOPgGiEKkZUzICQeDaP/fP6nf zo4TliNDEdRAKZT6yJVbJgxmYZDrPOUkt2V34jlie6RJ3usUHmSMwjgMPlnZXQIfj3Py krDX9+4UIUPms22uSAD+/Hrk5vcES8vS8utvOxhM7IJeCN7xxi24nD6LGV7xrOwX8lGI aqMQ+TTW+6MCXJhJ3UiUGgJ58h2crrYSIYNEaLxRWGcNcbeeUWQGpx4bgtbr2soVDQH8 4tAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705915753; x=1706520553; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sJoY6+VTogcF3M4Xg9rC9QVVqdj/s9EuJ/zKuAJoY5s=; b=bQogTD54ov4VZGo4i7AUg/SzqcmfxeSSpSJP8nmrj2riHk6eA5dheg67zlx93py0rq gNZKdBFs0RyV8FqVg+H2Ro5wbyZnBpiKdXCOOH4EdrLw6Ra9EHVBsYKIyj95BToNof6f THWylNlJ5N8OK2jDwYlIgUnVifFV0odQt9deXeigRM5NqYtk5pY8KOK44EPumDrILusT x610PbtjHsqoINHPUAXhYevSscPK2dJL1o64xJDYbGXjnGMZ5qdWuerWShr/lo/Q3+5d g69154Q0n1AqJFMpAK+BCG5817xmppAdMyFT+yne4bUKJk3uhClmf0qVcEn+gv9uFpUO UsSQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwkiUGzSypdg8QVlo47+/ARkE6rd8Ho2ZYnwb403fMdfi8J/zi6 V/dyTpzs6kIHs+Z76h4JEoNk7K+vomAs8dWUW7dPreOuId9nTvaUUMeNzZsUI80=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEbxE5Tq2XaSdTXLPlON1F7C9oj9guImAhDdqfh3mdusHLDi83eTItwrpayaUrS5X/Ser+1xQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1c82:b0:40e:b05f:6f75 with SMTP id k2-20020a05600c1c8200b0040eb05f6f75mr214991wms.115.1705915753160; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 01:29:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (91-167-176-17.subs.proxad.net. [91.167.176.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j28-20020adfb31c000000b003393457afc2sm2945946wrd.95.2024.01.22.01.29.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Jan 2024 01:29:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Message-Id: <FB780027-6B48-4985-95F2-E7EBE7354162@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_898FB324-C113-42CA-86B2-385C2C394477"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.300.61.1.2\))
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:28:41 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAG-CQxqE0Wit+WZ29_0Y_n-7yJreuCt9kxPPN26ZjNchFkU1qg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
References: <170431647814.62985.15974782567928382830@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAG-CQxqE0Wit+WZ29_0Y_n-7yJreuCt9kxPPN26ZjNchFkU1qg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.300.61.1.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/bUFMFCIfZwcujR64gomJDKIbIIw>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Roman Danyliw's Block on charter-ietf-lisp-04-06: (with BLOCK and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 09:29:20 -0000

Hi Roman,

Congrats for your appointment as new IETF Chair and also thanks for taking this responsibility.

I know that your days are now busier but I want to ping you whether you get a chance to review the suggestions Padma made to solve your block on the LISP Charter.

Thanks

Ciao 

L.


> On Jan 4, 2024, at 17:44, Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Roman 
> 
> Please see PPE for my comments inline
> 
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 1:14 PM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org <mailto:noreply@ietf.org>> wrote:
>> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
>> charter-ietf-lisp-04-06: Block
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> BLOCK:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Per the following set of work "Privacy and Security: The WG will work on EID
>> anonymity, VPN segmentation leveraging on the Instance ID, and traffic
>> anonymization. The reuse of existing mechanisms will be prioritized.":
>> 
>> -- What is the threat model assumed for "traffic anonymization" and "EID
>> anonymity"?  Could the desired security properties be clarified?
>> 
>> PPE - LISP has an (EID, Routing Location) pair, it is possible to learn of a specific long lived EID and then poll the mapping system to know its new bindings over time. It would be therefore possible to record and track long lived EIDs and identify the traffic specifically for that endpoint. Some desired security properties would be to have short lived EIDs as well as secured and restricted access to binding of an EID and locator for privacy. 
>  
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Per the following set of work "Privacy and Security: The WG will work on EID
>> anonymity, VPN segmentation leveraging on the Instance ID, and traffic
>> anonymization. The reuse of existing mechanisms will be prioritized.":
>> 
>> -- What will the output of this work look like?  Which milestone is it
>> associated with?
>> 
>> PPE - There are currently 2 WG drafts and the milestone is 
>> March 2025 Submit LISP Privacy and Security document(s) to the IESG for consideration (Privacy and Security) [EXPERIMENTAL]
>> 
> Thanks
> Padma