[lisp] Martin Duke's Block on charter-ietf-lisp-04-06: (with BLOCK and COMMENT)

[Martin Duke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-lisp-04-06: Block

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
BLOCK:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is the NAT traversal work going to prioritize existing solutions (e.g. STUN,
TURN, ICE), or have all those already been determined to be inadequate? If the
latter, LISP should coordinate with TSVWG on its NAT traversal solution.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is the reliable transport protocol required to be secure? (e.g., are you
looking at TCP/TLS, QUIC, and SCTP/DTLS, or just bare TCP/SCTP)