[lisp] EID Block Management Discussion Summary

Luigi Iannone <luigi.iannone@telecom-paristech.fr> Tue, 18 March 2014 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <luigi.iannone@telecom-paristech.fr>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37E51A03BC for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.151
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pYChDtGB0X22 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr (zproxy120.enst.fr [137.194.52.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9C01A04BC for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F3F10FDBC for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:43:41 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zproxy120.enst.fr
Received: from zproxy120.enst.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zproxy120.enst.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jq+Q6ecYwaP2 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:43:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dhcp164-05.enst.fr (unknown [137.194.165.5]) by zproxy120.enst.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E52510FCA6 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:43:41 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Luigi Iannone <luigi.iannone@telecom-paristech.fr>
In-Reply-To: <7CEA1C07-218E-4616-BDBB-74A0A4ECB471@telecom-paristech.fr>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:43:53 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <06706725-8659-4FF9-8D86-DFECA3184002@telecom-paristech.fr>
References: <7CEA1C07-218E-4616-BDBB-74A0A4ECB471@telecom-paristech.fr>
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/5gHD0u7B5l3hSO-e_pcj_hYLLqQ
Subject: [lisp] EID Block Management Discussion Summary
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:43:55 -0000

Hi All,

upon request of Joel during the last meeting in London is is the summary 
of the changes proposed for the next version of the draft conceding the EID Block Management.

- Delete the trailing paragraph of section 4 (already discussed on the mailing list)

- Delete the fees policy. It is not up to the WG to decide about fees.

- Re-phrase the availability of the registration information requirement avoiding putting specific numbers 
	(in the current version 99% up time is required).

Anybody objecting these changes???

Anybody with additional remarks/review/feedback?

Thanks

Luigi