IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call fo document draft-ietf-lisp-signal-free-multicast-02.txt

Fabio Maino <fmaino@cisco.com> Mon, 10 April 2017 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <fmaino@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39D1127A91 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p9dBQG-JQET4 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 837EB129510 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5952; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1491843973; x=1493053573; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=kbSRtnW1gN1rouRUJKzIQrOKUXXscoiij2PjesFKkEw=; b=VyAmDU7RWo5djqFyv/l44gtQlX1gHsHtH+GL8hBqQxG/rfqnVoXARy66 KFBGfZbGdur6LxXyiWnRNARXcpxtG8rw27nfYHXmtx27rvrHtcdA3Czgj KAA0f51ZAZxX6kM3QLBg4jpSj4pkflgbhGC9S29e9elCx9ORsUlLt7OIr E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AZAQBGuutY/5tdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1NhgQuNeZFIkCOFNIIPIQEKhXgCg2U/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYBAQEDAQFsGwsYJwcnHxETBgIBAYoLDqsuK4pSAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEBARwFhlCCBYJrhCgRAWiEeh8FkGuFNYZbhwCLWYF/hS6DN4UjgTqUAB84fQglFggYFUGEWxwZgWogNYcxgi4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,182,1488844800"; d="scan'208,217";a="410245140"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Apr 2017 17:06:12 +0000
Received: from [10.155.68.213] (dhcp-10-155-68-213.cisco.com [10.155.68.213]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3AH6Coh013517 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:06:12 GMT
To: lisp@ietf.org
References: <14678015-1353-42DD-9A8B-36C63E27722E@gigix.net> <9E46FC02-9D10-4E6B-99EC-40ECD01C0690@gigix.net>
From: Fabio Maino <fmaino@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <3e986c39-0c28-dc78-20e0-ecc8d85ace13@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 10:06:31 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9E46FC02-9D10-4E6B-99EC-40ECD01C0690@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------36AFFC58112724B300A1CA4F"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/GjNjqPZtR-JQx84nWuPY6dyr4vs>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call fo document draft-ietf-lisp-signal-free-multicast-02.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 17:06:20 -0000

Luigi,
I just realized that the message with my support to move this to IESG 
got stuck in my outbox while getting back from Chicago.

I think this draft should be handed to the AD.

Fabio

On 3/27/17 9:06 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
> Folks,
>
> the chairs did not receive any feedback concerning this call.
>
> Remember that silence is not consensus.
>
> We extend the WG Last Call until next Monday April 3rd, 2017.
>
> Please speak up.
>
> Luigi & Joel
>
>> On 11 Mar 2017, at 10:22, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net 
>> <mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> The authors of the LISP-Signal-Free-Multicast document 
>> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-signal-free-multicast-02] asked 
>> for WG Last Call.
>>
>> This email starts the usual two weeks WG Last Call, to end March 
>>  27th, 2017.
>>
>> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that 
>> it is ready for handing to the AD.
>> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain 
>> what it would take to address your concerns.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Luigi & Joel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email