IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call fo document draft-ietf-lisp-signal-free-multicast-02.txt

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Mon, 27 March 2017 16:34 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333921289B0; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x6mg-4v6XdIn; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22e.google.com (mail-it0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D8351293F4; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id y18so80943024itc.0; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qedWx/BlvGWPiVzCWexb9WytFYqTNx4qkH4cXPyqAs8=; b=IhlkbTNmylkKxM19eRD7VwyNICFaFBEbdfcn9BECFOcBZ7+2pa+6oVo53I1MwaALx3 irzRtAIKKlDIkemNJoExu6+KAsGvcQ8qtMjQMFdkS1NhPZzSh68mbnjX4gSmztVdgxdp DHCEsPPtiAtJMzbS3PIEdvmncae6yo+Et+MOlvJx/ht8+B6Z0VmSr95ndhcWuWkid4GK IwCmN6BY3c5GnUl488EJ65OLZY6+StDEFgdx2qNBh175rAIulRwn3q3s70dZ2LtbbG2o qIXR9pC3bf4KzVVpDHIc2x4RxrIi1qE+jOyttip7P1JZUxbUe2cypXrakAunI5nuoX3D adMQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=qedWx/BlvGWPiVzCWexb9WytFYqTNx4qkH4cXPyqAs8=; b=h97ki2aFQtfyoINlxhT3K5Km8ggwsmmg6FeQx8ixKMb39ewLEi4BAuA+0WqX4RgPu+ Jd+hMsL5ggGuLx8YWgsUzkVMzZMbYackpig14V5ye1afYDFGL1jztk3IaTPGgMMXJU3d iKq8WAbOgyIRz85ofVHeWMNf5t+1FIWrV5YgZTIa1To+Z+M48ggQOywhf4BwV2X5BB9F +Ahy6kcUbUgGe2PKAKyvGOIf3hpIxC5f2ZLA+uFrQKKOhQFlseQ7Ccs0Iw7SY4ixM4g1 goeSXchFGm1CWskMTrkAAGgd21VLJUhWDUQHFdcvLXDuokuyT2BVRcSzUHBCtzPkAV95 y+Sg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0+autDKdRfnIt/40eU1UInMOdH7VwxYqYBKWYO9EVPquIdDHzbhSnpOR+1Lrs6DA==
X-Received: by 10.36.64.135 with SMTP id n129mr10989264ita.95.1490632451581; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from t2001067c03700128c0b6a1f630a13618.v6.meeting.ietf.org (t2001067c03700128c0b6a1f630a13618.v6.meeting.ietf.org. [2001:67c:370:128:c0b6:a1f6:30a1:3618]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w188sm45067itc.6.2017.03.27.09.34.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9E46FC02-9D10-4E6B-99EC-40ECD01C0690@gigix.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 09:34:10 -0700
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <89C092F1-B2B2-4C48-93A6-5DEFD01B8DBE@gmail.com>
References: <14678015-1353-42DD-9A8B-36C63E27722E@gigix.net> <9E46FC02-9D10-4E6B-99EC-40ECD01C0690@gigix.net>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/lcn9cLVnkOfEaeSv8gp8btBByc4>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call fo document draft-ietf-lisp-signal-free-multicast-02.txt
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:34:16 -0000

Victor and I (co-authors) believe this should be moved to IESG review. That might be obvious, but if the authors don’t vote . . .  ;-)

Dino

> On Mar 27, 2017, at 9:06 AM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> the chairs did not receive any feedback concerning this call.
> 
> Remember that silence is not consensus.
> 
> We extend the WG Last Call until next Monday April 3rd, 2017.
> 
> Please speak up.
> 
> Luigi & Joel
> 
>> On 11 Mar 2017, at 10:22, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> The authors of the LISP-Signal-Free-Multicast document [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-signal-free-multicast-02] asked for WG Last Call. 
>> 
>> This email starts the usual two weeks WG Last Call, to end March  27th, 2017.
>> 
>> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD.
>> If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Luigi & Joel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email