IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lisp] LISP Use Cases

Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Sun, 09 August 2015 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CD71A87C2 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 15:07:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pn9qwmga0SZG for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 15:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04EBE1A8745 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Aug 2015 15:07:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicne3 with SMTP id ne3so114716997wic.1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 15:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-type:subject:date:message-id:cc:to :mime-version; bh=8mHVD++ONhgL0pulEZZK1Sv5YzIz3O7tT+M/MfJXYdY=; b=iKPuiQA69Ybu/ntZ9vnXdpV6FQma1Gj/rRpG1V5NO/BQoQXfMYJsBxwj33AV/xLxdi dhMLKNDacFSWrDM28v4L5iLhqUl/+K+u5CzC5kDo9WY4sN0sjMUb2JVfVASE8kC0A6B2 xMtWh8ZXetirbR4hiDIip3hN532gPYZfhUoWU0IieGipAPWufIZpeqVq4yehxMX4cVZK zI2u/YrHgOXSIPHWFrzeC0wTn76r6roPlhC/cXK+3lavrS4nE8lt/srtQSNRPMK2s752 lJtIjJAUuW274aJtFXX6GDK5RQWBZx/X6sX2wHAjtMP8QbV2Ici/YUK3o8GQgR2kkjT7 HGsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQksPXY1kqt4Ti2q62is8yq4ezMnexBKOSxsfdmPVf4QuuznydWb+TNS33adqCJKO2aJScvs
X-Received: by 10.194.62.211 with SMTP id a19mr36306057wjs.126.1439158027654; Sun, 09 Aug 2015 15:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.3] ([37.162.14.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gw7sm10526199wib.15.2015.08.09.15.07.06 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 09 Aug 2015 15:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0EBD0CE6-CE0D-4BC8-858C-94686A590C4A"
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:07:05 +0200
Message-Id: <77630894-48BB-483D-BE68-A15555F55CE2@gigix.net>
To: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/NMFndk4zf9F8tUcZepNzbshV01M>
Cc: Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>, Damien Saucez <damien.saucez@inria.fr>
Subject: [lisp] LISP Use Cases
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2015 22:07:11 -0000

Hi,

As previously said, "use case” might not be the best term, and 
as Darrel Lewis suggested during the meeting in Prague,
the WG should be careful not to create tight constraints by 
binding the protocol to narrow use cases.

Yet, it is always good to have an idea of where the technology we are
designing will be used. This will as well may help in taking some decisions 
along the way.

There is no predefined suggestion, but a good starting point for discussion
is the list provided by Fabio Maino in his mail:
 http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/current/msg05996.html <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/current/msg05996.html>


- LISP VPN (including integration with IPsec)
- NVO3 use case for DC virtualization (including support for VM mobility)
- SDN/NFV (including support for service chaining)
- IoT (LISP as connecting infrastructure for IoT applications)
- Mobile Node  (LISP-MN mobility)

Please send your feedback to which area should have priority.

Joel & Luigi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email