IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] LISP PubSub to Proposed Standard?

Jordi Paillissé <jordi.paillisse@upc.edu> Thu, 10 November 2022 10:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jordi.paillisse@upc.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACFAC15C504 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 02:15:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=upc-edu.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ShvXrJawUQqq for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 02:15:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01EF6C14F720 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 02:15:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id k8so1553677wrh.1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 02:15:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=upc-edu.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1NR5dt4eBuMQFeo71vzlRK4LEc37cU+61hZPz1WCK6I=; b=bZNoFq2pUAik/+NDhqLwcvNbHOnRwyb6LWQFlGMNuUd9SmGi8E2R9usFY1qcbwRvVg I+iotUO9YhgxlbnnsYBdy5Szt4wBsWXLEhk1B88jB+xs1i+7os7U7Mb6qmOUVRPuwbFA /E3IJH0QAfYxC0eLU2L8SsZvngUH1PKnDNT48huBAmjfv4/dhwCGzPyAFC3vWhjFQ21j pFJfH7WZPMoTX0CTEJ3LCmKfrfImWq1uRBkJiLn38bDCNc6HCF80b0bcRAQGFHXrEfJL Xrg09mC3aHLwJ98SYshDP+KjObWk5ATCeWtHlm1GV4QvJB+sJkF1uPuRDxXs9C6E79aU LyNQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1NR5dt4eBuMQFeo71vzlRK4LEc37cU+61hZPz1WCK6I=; b=tq+1Jm08XhdX1jZ611MSyzDiY7PdG0U4hsL2b4BGCjn0Ly0AEL6rWJxovmPAuXK0B7 CMet6kvs1DT8Aza3NnA4aSOsnoNpwgX07jxrM+D7Q60KNcFgqvRghqcxRAbRWx03dvnD EnTgZfWKhQ4k2j/ykqf7ar9i2EtoblWITe64KJxNDtTF7txxA5f3+J4pXGCUMQqxed3l 4/t4YDhAnkARu5hHFlD5pQJDcIo2THsZWMgkd11sRrTAC0g/xZ7BtHuEI6IdHac8vGce gmWmdaI5pToinU/ibdjhYD+iUHGT/xfy13y55eiHSwW1yU6M2r36hueHiExh9C/7weTg /s2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2QTwxANqdsFL4IjEVKCmkRSzgavTZW8djneuD7xz875dX1J56+ ybMss7Q3UORCoSVON9mjQreuf0NPlmCztcbl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM76hrFrlyDM5JGrxS2HOpqRSuGIaiqyazxSHWQd/lr6mra9j7jkDncfEGHgYFP4K6qwHeGU3w==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4f8d:0:b0:236:714b:29f0 with SMTP id d13-20020a5d4f8d000000b00236714b29f0mr38928152wru.145.1668075303829; Thu, 10 Nov 2022 02:15:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.192.149.244] (clients-xsf-100.upc.es. [147.83.201.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k28-20020a5d525c000000b0022e653f5abbsm15370990wrc.69.2022.11.10.02.15.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Nov 2022 02:15:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <ce2cfb21-fb6b-149c-6b8f-efe0cde00b50@upc.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:15:02 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.1
Content-Language: ca, en-GB
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, "Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)" <natal=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: lisp@ietf.org
References: <BN8PR11MB3588AFF6D1B8F86A1909FD94B63D9@BN8PR11MB3588.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <B42CB591-2F39-41E6-82BE-A29E13CD1053@gmail.com>
From: Jordi Paillissé <jordi.paillisse@upc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <B42CB591-2F39-41E6-82BE-A29E13CD1053@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/QQPznhPFyweXKCBV-G_42jz1o_c>
Subject: Re: [lisp] LISP PubSub to Proposed Standard?
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 10:15:08 -0000

I agree with moving the document forward. It's a valuable functionality.

Thanks,

Jordi

El 6/11/22 a les 13:57, Dino Farinacci ha escrit:
>
>> On Nov 6, 2022, at 12:27 PM, Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) <natal=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> On the meantime, what is the view of the WG on moving the document to Proposed Standard?
> I think it is critical to carry this fundamental solution as Proposed Standard. We have struggled for years keeping mappings up to date on proxy-ITRs.
>
> Pubsub provides an event triggered solution which I believe is fundamental functionality the architecture needs.
>
> Dino
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email