Re: [lisp] References needed for Intro document

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Wed, 16 October 2013 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592C011E82BE for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 06:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mQpBn0OCB0qx for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 06:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46AE11E82B1 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 06:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id 6D45118C14C; Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:23:58 -0400 (EDT)
To: lisp@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20131016132358.6D45118C14C@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 09:23:58 -0400
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [lisp] References needed for Intro document
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:24:06 -0000

I'm still waiting for a couple of these:

    > From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)

    > During the review of the Intro document at the Interim, in a couple of
    > places people said 'Oh we need a reference there, I'll get it to you
    > later' - and I dutifully marked down that I needed to add a reference -
    > but due to the time pressure, didn't write down who ..
    >
    > So if anyone was as the interim, and recognizes and of these (below) as
    > something they were going to send me a reference for, can you please do
    > so?

    > "The term 'node' is used here as it used in the IPv6 work."

I really need this one, otherwise I'm going to have to delete the mention of
IPv6, and instead put a home-grown definition in the initial small glossary -
but nobody has responded saying they're going to provide it?

    > "More importantly, this balance needs to hold for early adopters -
    > because if they do not receive benefits to their adoption, the sphere
    > of earliest adopters will not expand, and it will never get to
    > widespread deployment."

And I need this one too...

	Noel