Re: [lisp] References needed for Intro document

I have not been able to find a good reference to use for the earlier 
adopters.  Go without it.  If I find one, we can add it.  If someone 
else wants a reference, they can suggest one.

Yours,
Joel

On 10/16/13 9:23 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
> I'm still waiting for a couple of these:
>
>      > From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
>
>      > During the review of the Intro document at the Interim, in a couple of
>      > places people said 'Oh we need a reference there, I'll get it to you
>      > later' - and I dutifully marked down that I needed to add a reference -
>      > but due to the time pressure, didn't write down who ..
>      >
>      > So if anyone was as the interim, and recognizes and of these (below) as
>      > something they were going to send me a reference for, can you please do
>      > so?
>
>      > "The term 'node' is used here as it used in the IPv6 work."
>
> I really need this one, otherwise I'm going to have to delete the mention of
> IPv6, and instead put a home-grown definition in the initial small glossary -
> but nobody has responded saying they're going to provide it?
>
>      > "More importantly, this balance needs to hold for early adopters -
>      > because if they do not receive benefits to their adoption, the sphere
>      > of earliest adopters will not expand, and it will never get to
>      > widespread deployment."
>
> And I need this one too...
>
> 	Noel
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>